Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting?
Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com> Tue, 01 June 2010 11:26 UTC
Return-Path: <rgm@htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E57C33A67D7 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 04:26:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.022
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.022 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.023, BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nLGs9hYDn-ds for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 04:26:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from klovia.htt-consult.com (klovia.htt-consult.com [208.83.67.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FC043A67B5 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 04:26:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by klovia.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 046AA68B5A; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 11:19:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from klovia.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (klovia.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lv+28swPFDJj; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 07:19:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nc2400.htt-consult.com (h155.home.htt [208.83.67.155]) (Authenticated sender: rgm@htt-consult.com) by klovia.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92E2D68B50; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 07:19:24 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4C04EE61.2030008@htt-consult.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 07:26:25 -0400
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100430 Fedora/3.0.4-2.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tobias Heer <heer@cs.rwth-aachen.de>
References: <4BFAA6B0.6070806@ericsson.com> <4BFAE4F6.7090602@htt-consult.com> <7CC566635CFE364D87DC5803D4712A6C4CE97161CD@XCH-NW-10V.nw.nos.boeing.com> <4C03C38D.3000408@ericsson.com> <8E65F9C7-A00B-4CD2-8050-8CEAE0F29508@cs.rwth-aachen.de>
In-Reply-To: <8E65F9C7-A00B-4CD2-8050-8CEAE0F29508@cs.rwth-aachen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: HIP WG <hipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting?
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 11:26:52 -0000
On 06/01/2010 05:24 AM, Tobias Heer wrote: > Hi Gonzalo, > > I could give a more precise presentation regarding the changes in 5201 (the last one was quite quick and high level) but I think it would be most important to have some people to review the documents. I hope we will have the last issues sorted out within the next two weeks so that we can submit a new draft. > I would actually like to see a document reading meeting. We have a formal review of each section and get exact editorial/techincal changes. We do this a lot in IEEE 802, and I have done it in the past at IETF. > I have no issues coming to Maastricht for it is very close to the place I live but I think with sufficient participation on the mailing list we can possibly skip the face-to-face meeting. > > Tobias > > Am 31.05.2010 um 16:11 schrieb Gonzalo Camarillo: > > >> Hi, >> >> it is clear we need to have the documents reviewed. However, do you >> expect the reviewers to find issues that will require face-to-face >> discussions? If we need face-to-face time, I am happy to request a slot. >> However, I would not like to request a slot just to show a few slides >> without discussions. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Gonzalo >> >> >> On 25/05/2010 6:36 AM, Henderson, Thomas R wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: hipsec-bounces@ietf.org >>>> [mailto:hipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Robert Moskowitz >>>> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 1:44 PM >>>> To: Gonzalo Camarillo >>>> Cc: HIP >>>> Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? >>>> >>>> On 05/24/2010 12:17 PM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: >>>> >>>>> Folks, >>>>> >>>>> we need to decide whether or not we need face-to-face time >>>>> >>>> during the >>>> >>>>> next IETF. Opinions? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> It would be 'nice' to have a serious document review at that time. >>>> >>>> There shouldn't be quite the 'hand waving' we did at Anahiem, >>>> but actual >>>> documents for people to have read over and be reading to hum on or >>>> supply changes. >>>> >>>> >>> I cannot attend but I tend to agree that a review would be helpful to move things along, if you can form a quorum. >>> >>> - Tom >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Hipsec mailing list >> Hipsec@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec >> > > > >
- [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Henderson, Thomas R
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Tobias Heer
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Robert Moskowitz
- [Hipsec] Fwd: Re: Face-to-face meeting? Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Tobias Heer
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Tobias Heer
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Gonzalo Camarillo