Re: [Hipsec] Comment about Fig.6 in rfc5206-bis-01
"Henderson, Thomas R" <thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com> Thu, 20 January 2011 03:44 UTC
Return-Path: <thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1218928C138 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:44:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.466
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.466 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.133, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nv8aPLb9qcNe for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:44:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stl-smtpout-01.boeing.com (stl-smtpout-01.boeing.com [130.76.96.56]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50FC128C133 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:44:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stl-av-01.boeing.com (stl-av-01.boeing.com [192.76.190.6]) by stl-smtpout-01.ns.cs.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/8.14.4/SMTPOUT) with ESMTP id p0K3ktYD017061 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:47:03 -0600 (CST)
Received: from stl-av-01.boeing.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stl-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id p0K3ktWW003416; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:46:55 -0600 (CST)
Received: from XCH-NWHT-03.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch-nwht-03.nw.nos.boeing.com [130.247.71.23]) by stl-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id p0K3ktjT003406 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=OK); Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:46:55 -0600 (CST)
Received: from XCH-NW-10V.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.25.85]) by XCH-NWHT-03.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.71.23]) with mapi; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:46:54 -0800
From: "Henderson, Thomas R" <thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com>
To: 'Samu Varjonen' <samu.varjonen@hiit.fi>, HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:46:53 -0800
Thread-Topic: [Hipsec] Comment about Fig.6 in rfc5206-bis-01
Thread-Index: Acu3vFTjnbGLUATfSSOGNR5RWDLkfgAmD7Fw
Message-ID: <7CC566635CFE364D87DC5803D4712A6C4CED25ACF1@XCH-NW-10V.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <4D36B088.1000008@hiit.fi>
In-Reply-To: <4D36B088.1000008@hiit.fi>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Comment about Fig.6 in rfc5206-bis-01
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 03:44:38 -0000
> -----Original Message----- > From: hipsec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:hipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Samu Varjonen > Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 1:36 AM > To: HIP > Subject: [Hipsec] Comment about Fig.6 in rfc5206-bis-01 > > Hi, > > The Fig. 6 in draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-01 could be clearer on the > locator > part. IMO the way RFC 5770 handles this would be better. See the > proposal below. Hi Samu, thanks for the suggestion; I agree and will put it in the next revision unless anyone raises a concern. - Tom
- [Hipsec] Comment about Fig.6 in rfc5206-bis-01 Samu Varjonen
- Re: [Hipsec] Comment about Fig.6 in rfc5206-bis-01 Henderson, Thomas R