IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Hipsec] NAT traversal and the standards track work

Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Tue, 20 April 2010 12:44 UTC

Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4667D3A6A77 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:44:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.609
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.609 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.990, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VHRJB1byJR95 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (mailgw10.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.61]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 377823A6A56 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3d-b7bf6ae000005bec-e4-4bcda1bcc889
Received: from esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with SMTP id BC.B9.23532.CB1ADCB4; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:44:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.175]) by esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:44:44 +0200
Received: from mail.lmf.ericsson.se ([131.160.11.50]) by esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:44:44 +0200
Received: from [131.160.37.44] (EV001E681B5FE2.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.37.44]) by mail.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8214124D0 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:44:44 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <4BCDA1BC.1020701@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:44:44 +0300
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Apr 2010 12:44:44.0678 (UTC) FILETIME=[40DAFA60:01CAE087]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: [Hipsec] NAT traversal and the standards track work
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:44:57 -0000

Hi,

we need to decide what to do with NAT traversal when moving to the
standards track. We have the following drafts:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-nat-traversal/

The draft above will soon become an Experimental RFC.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-keranen-hip-native-nat-traversal/

The draft above proposes implementing HIP-based connectivity checks
instead of STUN-based ones.

http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-melen-hip-nat-mm-00.txt

The draft above, which needs to be revised, describes the mobility and
multihoming extensions for NAT traversal.

I would like to hear people's views on what to do here.

Cheers,

Gonzalo
HIP co-chair

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status