IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Hipsec] Rechartering the HIP WG

Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Tue, 16 February 2016 08:06 UTC

Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A051A877E for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:06:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gkMsq-dwRgYW for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:06:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sessmg22.ericsson.net (sessmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 688DC1A1B4B for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:06:02 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3a-f79ce6d000005138-2b-56c2d86820f6
Received: from ESESSHC011.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.51]) by sessmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 6A.C5.20792.868D2C65; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:06:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [148.135.149.119] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.53) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:06:00 +0100
To: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com>, HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>
References: <56C1C869.40800@ericsson.com> <56C24314.8010109@htt-consult.com>
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <56C2D867.9030200@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:05:59 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56C24314.8010109@htt-consult.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrMLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7sW7GjUNhBmdbNS2mLprMbNGw7jOj A5PH7klN7B5LlvxkCmCK4rJJSc3JLEst0rdL4MpY1/yXrWAbb8XpQ1cZGxgXcnUxcnBICJhI vJnk0MXICWSKSVy4t56ti5GLQ0jgMKPE6nnrWCGctYwSDxo2M4M0CAvoSkz+XwvSICLgKPGv +wEbiC0k4CNx88NZZhCbTcBCYsut+ywgNq+AtkTHkgZ2EJtFQFXi17qlYDWiAjESFzuPMEHU CEqcnPkErJ5TQF9i0Z7brCA2s4CBxJFFc6BseYntb+cwQ+zSllj+rIVlAqPALCTts5C0zELS soCReRWjaHFqcXFuupGRXmpRZnJxcX6eXl5qySZGYFAe3PLbagfjweeOhxgFOBiVeHgLIg6F CbEmlhVX5h5ilOBgVhLh3bgdKMSbklhZlVqUH19UmpNafIhRmoNFSZx3jfP6MCGB9MSS1OzU 1ILUIpgsEwenVAPjgtxUtvrZzJWFC1XuzVz+XjXJbK1LZ3X/45XT+Ttrv09vmHQs2SH8euX8 mZ/1U/Yv+8IoFct9Ladgdlk82xKNDSKb9KQmqM0zWPzM3CbZadXfqAcnL+a9qeGPfpqRvHLP lnUl2cEK71+ap7kFxl8+6ZtxibVVYaHTdZUzU84sCI9QK007l/NQiaU4I9FQi7moOBEA7pou TkYCAAA=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/KAkFmzppN93zAW29tRu7u9CZCPs>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Rechartering the HIP WG
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:06:04 -0000

Hi Bob,

sure, nothing prevents us to progress faster than the milestones... but
considering that we are around 5 years late with some of our existing
milestones, I did not want to be too aggressive ;-)

Cheers,

Gonzalo

On 15/02/2016 11:28 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> 
> 
> On 02/15/2016 07:45 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have talked with our AD and he has agreed to let us finish our
>> already-chartered items, add the HIP DEX to our charter, finish it, and
>> then close the WG.
>>
>> I have prepared the following Milestones to implement the plan above:
>>
>>   Milestones
>>
>> Jan 2017     Close the WG
>> Dec 2016     Submit RFC4423bis to the IESG
>> Oct 2016     WGLC RFC4423bis
>> Oct 2016    Submit HIP DEX to IESG
>> Sep 2016    WGLC HIP DEX
> 
> I would like to point out that both HIP BEX and DEX are included in IEEE
> 802.15.9 (along with a number of other KMPs) and it has been voted to
> RevCom.  That means that I would REALLY like to see this happen sooner
> that this milestone.  As such, I would appreciate comments and will do
> my best to respond to them.
> 
> thank you.
> 
>> Jun 2016     Submit the multihoming portion of RFC5206bis to the IESG
>> Jun 2016     Submit the mobility portion of RFC5206bis to the IESG
>> Apr 2016     Submit RFC5770bis to the IESG
>> Apr 2016     WGLC the multihoming portion of RFC5206bis
>> Apr 2016     WGLC the mobility portion of RFC5206bis
>>
>>
>> Please, send any comments you may have to the list.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Gonzalo
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hipsec mailing list
>> Hipsec@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email