Re: [Hipsec] Segmentation within HIP

Derek Fawcus <dfawcus+lists-hipsec@employees.org> Tue, 29 March 2016 06:52 UTC

Return-Path: <dfawcus@employees.org>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29EC712D164 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 23:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=employees.org; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=dfawcus+lists-hipsec@employees.org header.d=employees.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RPw9-8yI10N2 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 23:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cowbell.employees.org (cowbell.employees.org [IPv6:2001:1868:a000:17::142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4238C12D0A0 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 23:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cowbell.employees.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cowbell.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE63ED788D for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 23:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=employees.org; h= resent-from:resent-date:resent-message-id:resent-to:date:from:to :cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; s=selector1; bh=ssjuXo4XpDjBYwg6BYiiBsPYn98=; b=PL d7x66jJHHQiFwPHc1/IeaQ4hFWdkMQM6NyH+1JiEGP7ujTu/C7w5R2OM9pFUu7o0 t+hOdfd6SKMADHd3ja/BHw0oL9FPSGvKpiFrAMvujt1Aud2tIX081ODeoV8fcugl Ss1ntZig9BHQSgXCweQZUw6kN8eP0lhgctlnvsdtM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=employees.org; h=resent-from :resent-date:resent-message-id:resent-to:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q= dns; s=selector1; b=aXBYiRmvkYzcwrZNgd1v5UB5TcHZEGiYWNJl7VunqNoW 5DTB5bUYqy/Po5M/VGXDPDr/PK1pqDo6/Oi0jVn46Bn6KihI88iqEd2ysXf0YcXR SSk3BDKJGlimiYqXMrLceE7DTJNbPP36FUAtLIAC5RRhtvLViEzmLxDSyUMhkxk=
Received: by cowbell.employees.org (Postfix, from userid 1736) id BF42BD7884; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 23:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
Resent-From: Derek Fawcus <dfawcus@employees.org>
Resent-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 07:52:36 +0100
Resent-Message-ID: <20160329065236.GC12048@cowbell.employees.org>
Resent-To: hipsec@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 07:50:28 +0100
From: Derek Fawcus <dfawcus+lists-hipsec@employees.org>
To: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com>
Message-ID: <20160329065028.GB12048@cowbell.employees.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com>, Tom Henderson <tomhend@u.washington.edu>, dfawcus+lists-hipsec@employees.org, hipsec@ietf.org
References: <alpine.LRH.2.01.1603251816260.6230@hymn04.u.washington.edu> <56F9D086.1000105@htt-consult.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <56F9D086.1000105@htt-consult.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/KU33RnmpiggpZeXSzqn4xpFlvZg>
Cc: hipsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Segmentation within HIP
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 06:52:38 -0000

On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 08:47:02PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> For starters i would look at the UDP NAT tunneling mechinism to provide it.

Well,  UDP doesn't have any native segmentation / reassembly either;
so while it would help in getting across a NAT,  it'd not do anything
for fragments.

I could see someone digging out the scheme which was proposed a while
ago for UDP segmentation,  and casting it to fit within
draft-touch-tsvwg-udp-options-02.txt.

DF