Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis

Tom Henderson <tomhend@u.washington.edu> Wed, 22 July 2015 23:20 UTC

Return-Path: <tomhend@u.washington.edu>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0D71A1BD7 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:20:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9vueAumFgSwe for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout23.cac.washington.edu (mxout23.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CFA11B2F4B for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hymn04.u.washington.edu (hymn04.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.72]) by mxout23.cac.washington.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+UW15.02) with ESMTP id t6MNJxAY021673 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:20:00 -0700
Received: from hymn04.u.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hymn04.u.washington.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+UW14.04) with ESMTP id t6MNJwXD023707 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:19:58 -0700
Received: from localhost (Unknown UID 10745@localhost) by hymn04.u.washington.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+Submit-local) with ESMTP id t6MNJwNM023698 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:19:58 -0700
X-Auth-Received: from [73.181.150.17] by hymn04.u.washington.edu via HTTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:19:58 PDT
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:19:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tom Henderson <tomhend@u.washington.edu>
To: hipsec@ietf.org
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.01.1507221619580.22122@hymn04.u.washington.edu>
User-Agent: Web Alpine 2.01 (LRH 1302 2010-07-20)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.3.2322014, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2015.7.22.231517
X-PMX-Server: mxout23.cac.washington.edu
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report=' TO_IN_SUBJECT 0.5, HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, SUPERLONG_LINE 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1100_1199 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, __ANY_URI 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FORWARDED_MSG 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HTTPS_URI 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __MULTIPLE_URI_IN_BODY 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __TO_IN_SUBJECT 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NO_NAME 0, __URI_IN_BODY 0, __URI_NO_PATH 0, __URI_NS , __USER_AGENT 0'
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/MvwNJEwcVVRQjdnP-qm-WyMoVXU>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 23:20:04 -0000


On 07/03/2015 01:08 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:> Folks,
> 
> I would like to start a WGLC on the following draft. This WGLC will end
> on July 26th (i.e., right after the IETF meeting):
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis/
> 
> Please, send your comments to this list.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gonzalo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Hipsec mailing list
> Hipsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
> 

Below are my (minor) comments on this draft.  It is mostly unchanged from RFC6253, and I am fine with proceeding once the nits are fixed.

- references to RFC4843 should be replaced by references to RFC7343

- IANA considerations section should be redone; since you are not introducing any new parameters, you should just ask IANA to replace references to RFC6253 (for the CERT parameter, Certificate Types, and Notify Message Types) with references to this specification.

- in Section 3, replace 
  IP Address:2001:2C:5a14:26de:a07c:385b:de35:60e3
  with
  IP Address:2001:2c:5a14:26de:a07c:385b:de35:60e3


Tom