Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: HIP-based overlays
Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Wed, 24 February 2010 13:46 UTC
Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49A928C124 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 05:46:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.79
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.79 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.191, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CAv-xvO0luzv for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 05:46:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (mailgw10.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.61]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EECAB28C10D for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 05:45:59 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3d-b7c72ae00000040e-ee-4b852e150714
Received: from esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with SMTP id 5E.62.01038.51E258B4; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:48:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.172]) by esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:48:04 +0100
Received: from [131.160.126.196] ([131.160.126.196]) by esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:48:05 +0100
Message-ID: <4B852E14.9080809@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:48:04 +0200
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Henderson, Thomas R" <thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com>
References: <4B5F07F6.7080800@ericsson.com> <7CC566635CFE364D87DC5803D4712A6C4C1F48A7BD@XCH-NW-10V.nw.nos.boeing.com> <4B83B8DA.5000108@ericsson.com> <7CC566635CFE364D87DC5803D4712A6C4C1F48A7CE@XCH-NW-10V.nw.nos.boeing.com>
In-Reply-To: <7CC566635CFE364D87DC5803D4712A6C4C1F48A7CE@XCH-NW-10V.nw.nos.boeing.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Feb 2010 13:48:05.0252 (UTC) FILETIME=[FD744C40:01CAB557]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: HIP-based overlays
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:46:01 -0000
Hi Tom, > I agree that the HIP DATA could be used in other contexts; I had > another comment against that draft that if you decide to keep this as > a separate draft, you could clarify some things in the beginning of > the draft regarding the scope of the specification. sure, that will needs to be clarified in that draft. > Regarding the via draft, it seems to me to be much more coupled with > overlay forwarding, so I would suggest that either you describe the > other non-overlay use case(s) for these parameters, or else merge it > with HIP BONE. Anyway, if you still feel that it is important to > keep the via draft separate, I will not raise this point again. Ari will take care of describing the non-overlay case in the Via draft. Thanks, Gonzalo
- [Hipsec] WGLC: HIP-based overlays Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: HIP-based overlays Henderson, Thomas R
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-via-00 Henderson, Thomas R
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-hiccups-01 Henderson, Thomas R
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-reload-instance… Henderson, Thomas R
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-bone-04 Henderson, Thomas R
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: HIP-based overlays Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-via-00 Ari Keranen
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-reload-instance… Ari Keranen
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: HIP-based overlays Henderson, Thomas R
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-via-00 Henderson, Thomas R
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-reload-instance… Henderson, Thomas R
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: HIP-based overlays Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-via-00 Ari Keranen
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-reload-instance… Ari Keranen
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-reload-instance… Henderson, Thomas R
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-reload-instance… Ari Keranen
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-reload-instance… Henderson, Thomas R
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-bone-04 Ari Keranen
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-reload-instance… Ari Keranen
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-reload-instance… Henderson, Thomas R
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-reload-instance… Ari Keranen
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-hiccups-01 Jan Melen
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-hiccups-01 Jan Melen
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-hiccups-01 Jan Melen