[Hipsec] Fwd: Re: Face-to-face meeting?

Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Mon, 07 June 2010 15:18 UTC

Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4CA63A67A5 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 08:18:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.000, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H5jqg1ouWPuX for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 08:18:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (mailgw9.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.57]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 117D43A6EDE for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 00:51:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb39-b7b80ae000001aa1-e7-4c0ca51b7d2a
Received: from esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 14.BD.06817.B15AC0C4; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 09:51:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.177]) by esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 7 Jun 2010 09:51:54 +0200
Received: from [131.160.37.44] ([131.160.37.44]) by esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 7 Jun 2010 09:51:53 +0200
Message-ID: <4C0CA519.8080103@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 10:51:53 +0300
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Jun 2010 07:51:53.0952 (UTC) FILETIME=[4BB6F600:01CB0616]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: [Hipsec] Fwd: Re: Face-to-face meeting?
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 15:18:18 -0000

Resending because the mailing list did not seem to be working this weekend.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting?
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 10:30:45 +0300
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
To: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com>
CC: Tobias Heer <heer@cs.rwth-aachen.de>, HIP WG <hipsec@ietf.org>

Hi,

I asked whether or not we need a face-to-face meeting a couple of weeks
ago and we have gotten very few responses. With this level of energy, I
do not think it is worthwhile requesting a session. However, if people
do have the energy, please do not stay quiet; let us know on the list.

Thanks,

Gonzalo


On 05/06/2010 12:39 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> On 06/01/2010 07:30 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
>> Hi Bob,
>>
>> you want to edit the draft in real time during the face-to-face meeting?
>> Wouldn't it be more efficient to agree on what the draft needs to say
>> and then have the editor craft the exact text offline?
>>    
> 
> You have never attended an IEEE 802 meeting, then.
> 
> Yes text is crafted right then and there.  Scary.  But then for 802, it 
> is one of the key ways to make headway on documents...
> 
> Years back when I was co-chairing IPsec, we had a document reading 
> dinner.  We broke into teams having different nationalities on each 
> team; each team with a diffferent docuement.  Some changes were exact 
> text changes, others were 'this needs something', but it was a major 
> movement forward in the document.
> 
> it is just that at least for 5201-bis, it has taken Tobias and I a lot 
> of work to craft the changes.  I for one want a group of people to 
> seriously sit down and go through it, so this will NOT drag out.  (and 
> Tobias has supplied a lot more of the text than me; I have been more 'we 
> need something here').
> 
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Gonzalo
>>
>> On 01/06/2010 2:26 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>    
>>> On 06/01/2010 05:24 AM, Tobias Heer wrote:
>>>      
>>>> Hi Gonzalo,
>>>>
>>>> I could give a more precise presentation regarding the changes in 5201 (the last one was quite quick and high level) but I think it would be most important to have some people to review the documents. I hope we will have the last issues sorted out within the next two weeks so that we can submit a new draft.
>>>>
>>>>        
>>> I would actually like to see a document reading meeting. We have a
>>> formal review of each section and get exact editorial/techincal changes.
>>> We do this a lot in IEEE 802, and I have done it in the past at IETF.
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>> I have no issues coming to Maastricht for it is very close to the place I live but I think with sufficient participation on the mailing list we can possibly skip the face-to-face meeting.
>>>>
>>>> Tobias
>>>>
>>>> Am 31.05.2010 um 16:11 schrieb Gonzalo Camarillo:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> it is clear we need to have the documents reviewed. However, do you
>>>>> expect the reviewers to find issues that will require face-to-face
>>>>> discussions? If we need face-to-face time, I am happy to request a slot.
>>>>> However, I would not like to request a slot just to show a few slides
>>>>> without discussions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Gonzalo
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 25/05/2010 6:36 AM, Henderson, Thomas R wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: hipsec-bounces@ietf.org
>>>>>>> [mailto:hipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Robert Moskowitz
>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 1:44 PM
>>>>>>> To: Gonzalo Camarillo
>>>>>>> Cc: HIP
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 05/24/2010 12:17 PM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>              
>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> we need to decide whether or not we need face-to-face time
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                
>>>>>>> during the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>              
>>>>>>>> next IETF. Opinions?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                
>>>>>>> It would be 'nice' to have a serious document review at that time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There shouldn't be quite the 'hand waving' we did at Anahiem,
>>>>>>> but actual
>>>>>>> documents for people to have read over and be reading to hum on or
>>>>>>> supply changes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>              
>>>>>> I cannot attend but I tend to agree that a review would be helpful to move things along, if you can form a quorum.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Tom
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Hipsec mailing list
>>>>> Hipsec@ietf.org
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>
>>