[Hipsec] Fwd: Re: Face-to-face meeting?
Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Mon, 07 June 2010 15:18 UTC
Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4CA63A67A5 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 08:18:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.000, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H5jqg1ouWPuX for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 08:18:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (mailgw9.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.57]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 117D43A6EDE for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 00:51:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb39-b7b80ae000001aa1-e7-4c0ca51b7d2a
Received: from esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 14.BD.06817.B15AC0C4; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 09:51:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.177]) by esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 7 Jun 2010 09:51:54 +0200
Received: from [131.160.37.44] ([131.160.37.44]) by esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 7 Jun 2010 09:51:53 +0200
Message-ID: <4C0CA519.8080103@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 10:51:53 +0300
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Jun 2010 07:51:53.0952 (UTC) FILETIME=[4BB6F600:01CB0616]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: [Hipsec] Fwd: Re: Face-to-face meeting?
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 15:18:18 -0000
Resending because the mailing list did not seem to be working this weekend. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 10:30:45 +0300 From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> To: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com> CC: Tobias Heer <heer@cs.rwth-aachen.de>, HIP WG <hipsec@ietf.org> Hi, I asked whether or not we need a face-to-face meeting a couple of weeks ago and we have gotten very few responses. With this level of energy, I do not think it is worthwhile requesting a session. However, if people do have the energy, please do not stay quiet; let us know on the list. Thanks, Gonzalo On 05/06/2010 12:39 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > On 06/01/2010 07:30 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: >> Hi Bob, >> >> you want to edit the draft in real time during the face-to-face meeting? >> Wouldn't it be more efficient to agree on what the draft needs to say >> and then have the editor craft the exact text offline? >> > > You have never attended an IEEE 802 meeting, then. > > Yes text is crafted right then and there. Scary. But then for 802, it > is one of the key ways to make headway on documents... > > Years back when I was co-chairing IPsec, we had a document reading > dinner. We broke into teams having different nationalities on each > team; each team with a diffferent docuement. Some changes were exact > text changes, others were 'this needs something', but it was a major > movement forward in the document. > > it is just that at least for 5201-bis, it has taken Tobias and I a lot > of work to craft the changes. I for one want a group of people to > seriously sit down and go through it, so this will NOT drag out. (and > Tobias has supplied a lot more of the text than me; I have been more 'we > need something here'). > >> Cheers, >> >> Gonzalo >> >> On 01/06/2010 2:26 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >>> On 06/01/2010 05:24 AM, Tobias Heer wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Gonzalo, >>>> >>>> I could give a more precise presentation regarding the changes in 5201 (the last one was quite quick and high level) but I think it would be most important to have some people to review the documents. I hope we will have the last issues sorted out within the next two weeks so that we can submit a new draft. >>>> >>>> >>> I would actually like to see a document reading meeting. We have a >>> formal review of each section and get exact editorial/techincal changes. >>> We do this a lot in IEEE 802, and I have done it in the past at IETF. >>> >>> >>> >>>> I have no issues coming to Maastricht for it is very close to the place I live but I think with sufficient participation on the mailing list we can possibly skip the face-to-face meeting. >>>> >>>> Tobias >>>> >>>> Am 31.05.2010 um 16:11 schrieb Gonzalo Camarillo: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> it is clear we need to have the documents reviewed. However, do you >>>>> expect the reviewers to find issues that will require face-to-face >>>>> discussions? If we need face-to-face time, I am happy to request a slot. >>>>> However, I would not like to request a slot just to show a few slides >>>>> without discussions. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Gonzalo >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 25/05/2010 6:36 AM, Henderson, Thomas R wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: hipsec-bounces@ietf.org >>>>>>> [mailto:hipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Robert Moskowitz >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 1:44 PM >>>>>>> To: Gonzalo Camarillo >>>>>>> Cc: HIP >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 05/24/2010 12:17 PM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Folks, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> we need to decide whether or not we need face-to-face time >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> during the >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> next IETF. Opinions? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> It would be 'nice' to have a serious document review at that time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There shouldn't be quite the 'hand waving' we did at Anahiem, >>>>>>> but actual >>>>>>> documents for people to have read over and be reading to hum on or >>>>>>> supply changes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> I cannot attend but I tend to agree that a review would be helpful to move things along, if you can form a quorum. >>>>>> >>>>>> - Tom >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Hipsec mailing list >>>>> Hipsec@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >>
- [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Henderson, Thomas R
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Tobias Heer
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Robert Moskowitz
- [Hipsec] Fwd: Re: Face-to-face meeting? Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Tobias Heer
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Tobias Heer
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Gonzalo Camarillo