Re: [Hipsec] Missing HIP control flags registry?
Ari Keranen <ari.keranen@nomadiclab.com> Fri, 18 June 2010 12:08 UTC
Return-Path: <ari.keranen@nomadiclab.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89A53A688B for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 05:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.949
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.650, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AtKp8wlqox5B for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 05:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gw.nomadiclab.com (n2.nomadiclab.com [IPv6:2001:14b8:400:101::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B62A83A6359 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 05:08:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gw.nomadiclab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A81964E6DC; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:08:53 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at nomadiclab.com
Received: from gw.nomadiclab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (inside.nomadiclab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6Cgk9E1Nd4Ks; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:08:53 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:14b8:400:101:21c:23ff:fe45:a6c1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400:101:21c:23ff:fe45:a6c1]) by gw.nomadiclab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB2E14E6DA; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:08:52 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <4C1B61D4.3060302@nomadiclab.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:08:52 +0300
From: Ari Keranen <ari.keranen@nomadiclab.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com>
References: <4C1A2A9A.8010703@nomadiclab.com> <4C1A314D.80401@htt-consult.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C1A314D.80401@htt-consult.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: HIP WG <hipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Missing HIP control flags registry?
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:08:50 -0000
On 06/17/2010 05:29 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > On 06/17/2010 10:00 AM, Ari Keranen wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> It seems that there is no IANA registry for the HIP control flags [1] >> or even policy defined how to reserve them. Is this correct? That >> could be something to fix in the bis version. > > Tobias and I were discussing Control flags yesterday that should bring > some focus to this. OK, good. > Good catch, Ari. Thanks, although actually Jari spotted a similar flaw in the HIP VIA draft and that led me looking for how it was done in the main drafts. Cheers, Ari
- [Hipsec] Missing HIP control flags registry? Ari Keranen
- Re: [Hipsec] Missing HIP control flags registry? Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [Hipsec] Missing HIP control flags registry? Ari Keranen