[Hipsec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
"Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Tue, 05 July 2016 14:01 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietf.org
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E591512D592; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 07:01:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.25.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20160705140143.22339.24069.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 07:01:43 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/TFHef4KZzanNvHJgAyWcBa7oI54>
Cc: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis@ietf.org, hipsec@ietf.org, hip-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [Hipsec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 14:01:44 -0000
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-10: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 3.3 - This fails to distinguish between an invalid certificate (e.g. bad signature, unknown signer) and one that is valid, but is not acceptable for this purpose. I don't get why that is ok for HIP, can you explain? If it is ok, I think you need to say so. If it is not ok (as I'd suspect) then you appear to need to change text or one more new error code. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Section 7 - I'm fine that this doesn't repeat stuff from 5203, but a sentence saying to go look there too would maybe be good. (I'm not sure if that would fix Alexey's discuss or not. If not, then ignore me and just talk to him about his discuss.)
- Re: [Hipsec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Miika Komu
- Re: [Hipsec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Julien Laganier
- Re: [Hipsec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Julien Laganier
- Re: [Hipsec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Julien Laganier
- Re: [Hipsec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Hipsec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Robert Moskowitz
- [Hipsec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Hipsec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Julien Laganier