IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS

Miika Komu <mkomu@cs.hut.fi> Wed, 19 January 2011 07:51 UTC

Return-Path: <mkomu@cs.hut.fi>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3283A70D6 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:51:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hyTDEJrG8Dtl for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:51:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.cs.hut.fi (mail.cs.hut.fi [130.233.192.7]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 577F43A6FB2 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:51:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hutcs.cs.hut.fi ([130.233.192.10] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.hut.fi with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1PfSrp-0006Ab-Jk for hipsec@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:54:09 +0200
Message-ID: <4D3698A1.7030105@cs.hut.fi>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:54:09 +0200
From: Miika Komu <mkomu@cs.hut.fi>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: hipsec@ietf.org
References: <4D3449E3.50904@ericsson.com> <1486BB76-57BF-49A9-85A0-8136C6EC2 55F@cs.rwth-aachen.de> <4D355F0B.8080305@ericsson.com> <F4B69051-1157-403D- 93BB-F09EA557C408@nomadiclab.com><B472C1B3-4B7E-4088-AFAD-D5AFF3F6A0E0@cs.rwth-aachen.de> <4D3578A7.8000101@hiit.fi> <7CC566635CFE364D87DC5803D4712A6C4CED25ACE0@XCH-NW-10V.nw.nos.boeing.com>
In-Reply-To: <7CC566635CFE364D87DC5803D4712A6C4CED25ACE0@XCH-NW-10V.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 07:51:32 -0000

Hi,

On 01/19/2011 07:46 AM, Henderson, Thomas R wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: hipsec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:hipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On
>> Behalf Of Samu Varjonen
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 3:25 AM
>> To: hipsec@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS
>>
>> On 18/01/11 13:22, Tobias Heer wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Am 18.01.2011 um 11:21 schrieb Ari Keranen:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'd go for publishing experimental CERT now and bis'ed PS version
>> later with the rest of the PS HIP stuff.
>>>>
>>> I second that. I think it makes sense to publish the RFC as
>> experimental first.
>>>
>>> The draft is a companion document for 5201 (not bis).
>>> I think it should be published as experimental right now. However, I
>> think we might consider a non-experimental version in the future (when
>> 5201-bis is done).
>>>
>>> Tobias
>>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>
> +1

ok, fine by me too.

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status