Re: [Hipsec] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-13: (with COMMENT)

Tom Henderson <tomhend@u.washington.edu> Mon, 19 September 2016 05:31 UTC

Return-Path: <tomhend@u.washington.edu>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70BCE12B104; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 22:31:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.516
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.316, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CMjOFZc2rsDe; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 22:31:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout24.cac.washington.edu (mxout24.cac.washington.edu [140.142.234.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DF5212B02F; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 22:31:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hymn02.u.washington.edu (hymn02.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.71]) by mxout24.cac.washington.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+UW16.03) with ESMTP id u8J5V6sM025630 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 18 Sep 2016 22:31:07 -0700
Received: from hymn02.u.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hymn02.u.washington.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+UW16.03) with ESMTP id u8J5V3E9003480; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 22:31:03 -0700
Received: from localhost (Unknown UID 5440@localhost) by hymn02.u.washington.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+Submit-local) with ESMTP id u8J5V3h1003457; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 22:31:03 -0700
X-Auth-Received: from [73.140.18.44] by hymn02.u.washington.edu via HTTP; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 22:31:03 PDT
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 22:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tom Henderson <tomhend@u.washington.edu>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.01.1609182231030.8367@hymn02.u.washington.edu>
User-Agent: Web Alpine 2.01 (LRH 1302 2010-07-20)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
X-PMX-Version: 6.2.1.2493963, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2016.9.19.52717
X-PMX-Server: mxout24.cac.washington.edu
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIIII, Probability=9%, Report=' MULTIPLE_RCPTS 0.1, HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, SUPERLONG_LINE 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1200_1299 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, DATE_TZ_NA 0, LEGITIMATE_NEGATE 0, LEGITIMATE_SIGNS 0, MSG_THREAD 0, MULTIPLE_REAL_RCPTS 0, NO_CTA_URI_FOUND 0, NO_URI_FOUND 0, NO_URI_HTTPS 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CC_NAME 0, __CC_NAME_DIFF_FROM_ACC 0, __CC_REAL_NAMES 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FORWARDED_MSG 0, __HAS_CC_HDR 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_TEXT_P 0, __MIME_TEXT_P1 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __MULTIPLE_RCPTS_CC_X2 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NAME 0, __TO_NAME_DIFF_FROM_ACC 0, __TO_REAL_NAMES 0, __USER_AGENT 0'
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/W_skFfHww_wh_NE9us8Pmx2MHlM>
Cc: hipsec@ietf.org, draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, hip-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 05:31:28 -0000

Hi Stephen, please see below.

On 09/14/2016 03:18 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-13: No Objection
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> My review was based on the diff vs. 5206 [1], and turned
> up nothing new of note:-) Seems like a reasonable update
> to me.
> 
> I do however agree about the privacy issue raised by Mirja
> wrt exposing locators. It is worth noting that, so that
> implementers have it flagged that they need to consider
> that - not doing so caused quite a fuss for WebRTC so
> better to not repeat that.

I proposed some text about privacy issues with exposing locators in the multihoming draft comment resolution (earlier today)-- do you think something along those lines fits with this draft also (mobility)?   Perhaps rephrased to mention that even in a non-multihoming case, a host should be aware of any privacy issues of the locator that it chooses to next expose after a mobility event renders its current locator unusable...

- Tom