Re: [Hipsec] A review of draft-ietf-hip-dex-02.txt

René Hummen <hummen.committees@gmail.com> Fri, 03 June 2016 11:26 UTC

Return-Path: <hummen.committees@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B2F12D0F0 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 04:26:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bDkIo0eiPCVe for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 04:26:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22f.google.com (mail-oi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83C0012B008 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 04:26:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id j1so121713533oih.3 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 03 Jun 2016 04:26:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=v+fa9qs/Fw3A65eTf7/A8fq/z85NuTYwLxUYJDfca/o=; b=uzKU/1hPfAS19ALRC70PSNZ7QAiX4YUdPC0VyBzsJMhDk2xHmR2DE0fpN7fnl1eo2y Es3i+zk2v3QchfoOHFzo9bZZ+1QTSWS9PxCzlNLPUsi6E3iFhmQLqCAexqyEI8HFtI75 UF5vpNSCykjQteJoLtfogNJD3+cUguELaD0ENgLg66tNE1OPVPHcwkX6z+2exXkeIHOG eFlcHedgKlnmJt71k5xxH81wNXMWRlbekJcbfErgU0HReTwmrpFBjv7aLrairJj5dg/w Er794yHWzJAeZNQpItsLEWx9iAtxwWVUQtA/G/XubBCBqPTFdJ9cHgYwuxduyAK4xRou iPTQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=v+fa9qs/Fw3A65eTf7/A8fq/z85NuTYwLxUYJDfca/o=; b=eWmds5PW9pTJYN6Ecv+NvCpvPfnx8OUZLAH8DYobG3R29zU3NAeo3tHBy8s02O+xWg DShlyOi5u5QiQn/zqy0GGOvZuFNNpJr9+w7a+hK7OOfecCGpQ/j3TkMjY8ASQz+VLeoJ IGzmefV7ljxIEl7mmLtMTbsqxRuSxPqAPcA9XhvYcgqowm9uw2hdhmpOqje3t+0BYilo AgtzLH4wjEPUpWxIcnNG7B5PE4wuetR1ZwVuKYK7NywbxccxMKJOL3Ac1o6/aG+Yr1eB jw+tdMiW/zVSqmlCOR4E3VUOyqU418+G44T51+GNoRLPYsvkuQ/GeYFvDAt8bgRRsUPX 17Sg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKE4NI/6hS4I29vtF08c4TRwNTr+L6tgXEVmh+4zHBf+52xnDIrEWq+Q8WNTEq9l8iqXJJfhx7J4lbVVQ==
X-Received: by 10.157.2.174 with SMTP id 43mr1402454otl.11.1464953210790; Fri, 03 Jun 2016 04:26:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.155.35 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 04:26:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <573EDD8A.6050405@ericsson.com>
References: <20160321203627.12199.62928.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <56F98E90.10601@ericsson.com> <CAEhFMchqnp4njqabjo3KOo=Zsmb4dtw7RBTsFgbtdP06wfKRxw@mail.gmail.com> <573EDD8A.6050405@ericsson.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?UmVuw6kgSHVtbWVu?= <hummen.committees@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 13:26:50 +0200
Message-ID: <CANS20HM1dgdNcJFfYDMk1ZgFM2e9ZFabTQ32VR64h9VnGisUBg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Miika Komu <miika.komu@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c09c5aabde9c605345dffdb
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/XM0nOxBD9Jmej4f2KZfRYUFR7r0>
Cc: hipsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] A review of draft-ietf-hip-dex-02.txt
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 11:26:53 -0000

Hi Miika,

2016-05-20 11:48 GMT+02:00 Miika Komu <miika.komu@ericsson.com>om>:

> Hi,
>
> On 05/16/2016 06:50 PM, René Hummen wrote:
>
>> Hi Miika, all,
>>
>> thanks for reviewing the draft!
>>
>
> my pleasure. I am ok with your changes, just a small note below.
>
>      > 2.1.  Requirements Terminology
>>
>>     In section 6.3, you are introduce also -> notation, which was
>>     not explained.
>>
>>
>> I didn't think an explanation of this formal notation was necessary as
>> it is also not further described, e.g., in RFC5869. What would you like
>> me to write here?
>>
>
> I should probably read RFC5869 before I can understand how to implement
> the key derivation for DEX. It was a bit difficult to follow what is the
> input and especially what is the resulting output.
>
> The reference for RFC5869 is missing?
>

 I added the reference during my revision.

BR
René