Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting?
Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com> Fri, 04 June 2010 21:39 UTC
Return-Path: <rgm@htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE4343A68D5 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 14:39:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.018
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.018 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.019, BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JtM6L68SaP77 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 14:39:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from klovia.htt-consult.com (klovia.htt-consult.com [208.83.67.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60AFF3A6782 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 14:39:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by klovia.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A5468B47; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 21:32:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from klovia.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (klovia.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xv8oLm-HC5+f; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 17:32:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nc2400.htt-consult.com (h155.home.htt [208.83.67.155]) (Authenticated sender: rgm@htt-consult.com) by klovia.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6552968A8A; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 17:32:17 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4C09728F.7020801@htt-consult.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:39:27 -0400
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100430 Fedora/3.0.4-2.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
References: <4BFAA6B0.6070806@ericsson.com> <4BFAE4F6.7090602@htt-consult.com> <7CC566635CFE364D87DC5803D4712A6C4CE97161CD@XCH-NW-10V.nw.nos.boeing.com> <4C03C38D.3000408@ericsson.com> <8E65F9C7-A00B-4CD2-8050-8CEAE0F29508@cs.rwth-aachen.de> <4C04EE61.2030008@htt-consult.com> <4C04EF58.9050200@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C04EF58.9050200@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: HIP WG <hipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting?
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 21:39:57 -0000
On 06/01/2010 07:30 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: > Hi Bob, > > you want to edit the draft in real time during the face-to-face meeting? > Wouldn't it be more efficient to agree on what the draft needs to say > and then have the editor craft the exact text offline? > You have never attended an IEEE 802 meeting, then. Yes text is crafted right then and there. Scary. But then for 802, it is one of the key ways to make headway on documents... Years back when I was co-chairing IPsec, we had a document reading dinner. We broke into teams having different nationalities on each team; each team with a diffferent docuement. Some changes were exact text changes, others were 'this needs something', but it was a major movement forward in the document. it is just that at least for 5201-bis, it has taken Tobias and I a lot of work to craft the changes. I for one want a group of people to seriously sit down and go through it, so this will NOT drag out. (and Tobias has supplied a lot more of the text than me; I have been more 'we need something here'). > Cheers, > > Gonzalo > > On 01/06/2010 2:26 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >> On 06/01/2010 05:24 AM, Tobias Heer wrote: >> >>> Hi Gonzalo, >>> >>> I could give a more precise presentation regarding the changes in 5201 (the last one was quite quick and high level) but I think it would be most important to have some people to review the documents. I hope we will have the last issues sorted out within the next two weeks so that we can submit a new draft. >>> >>> >> I would actually like to see a document reading meeting. We have a >> formal review of each section and get exact editorial/techincal changes. >> We do this a lot in IEEE 802, and I have done it in the past at IETF. >> >> >> >>> I have no issues coming to Maastricht for it is very close to the place I live but I think with sufficient participation on the mailing list we can possibly skip the face-to-face meeting. >>> >>> Tobias >>> >>> Am 31.05.2010 um 16:11 schrieb Gonzalo Camarillo: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> it is clear we need to have the documents reviewed. However, do you >>>> expect the reviewers to find issues that will require face-to-face >>>> discussions? If we need face-to-face time, I am happy to request a slot. >>>> However, I would not like to request a slot just to show a few slides >>>> without discussions. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Gonzalo >>>> >>>> >>>> On 25/05/2010 6:36 AM, Henderson, Thomas R wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: hipsec-bounces@ietf.org >>>>>> [mailto:hipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Robert Moskowitz >>>>>> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 1:44 PM >>>>>> To: Gonzalo Camarillo >>>>>> Cc: HIP >>>>>> Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? >>>>>> >>>>>> On 05/24/2010 12:17 PM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Folks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> we need to decide whether or not we need face-to-face time >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> during the >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> next IETF. Opinions? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> It would be 'nice' to have a serious document review at that time. >>>>>> >>>>>> There shouldn't be quite the 'hand waving' we did at Anahiem, >>>>>> but actual >>>>>> documents for people to have read over and be reading to hum on or >>>>>> supply changes. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> I cannot attend but I tend to agree that a review would be helpful to move things along, if you can form a quorum. >>>>> >>>>> - Tom >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Hipsec mailing list >>>> Hipsec@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > >
- [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Henderson, Thomas R
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Tobias Heer
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Robert Moskowitz
- [Hipsec] Fwd: Re: Face-to-face meeting? Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Tobias Heer
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Tobias Heer
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Gonzalo Camarillo