IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Hipsec] Re-doing the IESG ballot for draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal

"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Fri, 21 February 2020 12:35 UTC

Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D30120033; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 04:35:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=bpQY9Ow1; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=MUGMRg/1
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 36EXbjVTp1E7; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 04:35:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A0531200D6; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 04:35:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6939; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1582288506; x=1583498106; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=mD29daXJJBwa551kQSlIemlcH5vJwWMhsFmrNfwg9Ik=; b=bpQY9Ow1NkFxXOYl3cMwq85WQofLKB3Q7I6iGaaEjuWQqB4bO51gsLH+ lrx55q5k0TFQg8Mg/loWbowseQLNO/Wi7XJ6ntSN/yZVLZ1mZLKenZjSi edTTlWz7Nfa1v14geJ4ZLGrD7bO+M+AbLlz7vNIqlNEFL2s2imDKxIwEM s=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:uKmxAxBrpBgE0fbsz+VOUyQJPHJ1sqjoPgMT9pssgq5PdaLm5Zn5IUjD/qs13kTRU9Dd7PRJw6rNvqbsVHZIwK7JsWtKMfkuHwQAld1QmgUhBMCfDkiuIeD7aSc5EexJVURu+DewNk0GUMs=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AUDgCWzU9e/49dJa1mHQEBAQkBEQUFAYF7gSUvUAVsWCAECyqEFINGA4pxgjqTV4RiglIDVAkBAQEMAQEnBgIEAQGEQBmBcyQ4EwIDDQEBBQEBAQIBBQRthTcMhWkWER0BATcBEQFKAgQwJwQBDSeDBAGBfU0DLgEOog8CgTmIYnWBMoJ/AQEFgTMChBAYggwDBoE4jCQagUE/gREnDBSCTIMiAgIagXaCZDKCLJBlhXCZRQqCPJZkHJsujnCbRwIEAgQFAg4BAQWBaSIqgS5wFWUBgkFQGA2OHYNzhRSFQXSBKY4UAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,468,1574121600"; d="scan'208,217";a="445365975"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 21 Feb 2020 12:35:05 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 01LCZ5Ei015362 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:35:05 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:35:05 -0600
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:35:04 -0600
Received: from NAM11-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:35:04 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=MgdzER1DYgVYFN8ZqHQcdmj+AId5Rr0c6UyDkZ7DuZC2mI9GRlV1S+yMfsNxaX8XDrZacm/X0vnbUt5FM9/LtYDhRIl3JMsAUbIoGxztDKC4utP49/6UBnYbPdw3QhVS/1uRmExlAMDqzxBw7o/LmePUPCVfL6rQeRMW9w0me3Xoi8AJdO7ixPlet50d9fqF4QCQqZDTkrQO4iHqBaagsnCtMw6AatX7t5M4ByLi6P4mfgeuC528KuCY3dtlikyc/8iumEFS8G65oTrV5UQOf2dNAIvJeeDF/syxg1Ww/sVslbeZDvWt+3WAPyGVQCusu7u74BxctC9uQ6GwNn1PWg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=mD29daXJJBwa551kQSlIemlcH5vJwWMhsFmrNfwg9Ik=; b=WpnrrZjRXYUEiy63UJAEm+yiyQdGojE10RkBeQwv83BPxHjQpDomPAza2wMPwGUJ9a5PG819cPoIf/o5BrCQbBOzdbySGfiS1Ph7RgIey7E/e2bKwGfmyf7/Yjv4uN3qVvL1XdyAm3jvJCuSkhpiF/FGTB42icwP9cn3gHygp6NLa7ajfmC7od0lJXkqHJWCZFg9e+f0VjAwmysF6amxyKG2qJsJzbbrk0vEpasrk25t0N/hr1yCjIr+jCaMlZcVpQPamCbl7nw+5INGXWoomdbfcnd25iOkQJk2UjoV7L7r3C9zhZALJXrVR9VgePzY0wPSD9D6ECnurL04uCtsoQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=mD29daXJJBwa551kQSlIemlcH5vJwWMhsFmrNfwg9Ik=; b=MUGMRg/1ZNM9NX3AyIJvC00yzRyGxEYKDAeVE8a4co+xWk62Ks4W9pO26IZW/aY85DsADPKaYHAU+pH5nsSnRh6E2N/biumKp6OY9a+jXuXeehwL4HDb5tKT2ttxHmC7uJ49Eql0R1Sa2KdYTqknCth94OmnLREaoX5HeFfDu5Q=
Received: from DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:10d::13) by DM5PR11MB1818.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:114::9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2729.22; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:35:04 +0000
Received: from DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::680d:e22e:72d5:67ca]) by DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::680d:e22e:72d5:67ca%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2750.021; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:35:04 +0000
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "hipsec@ietf.org" <hipsec@ietf.org>
CC: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org>
Thread-Topic: Re-doing the IESG ballot for draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal
Thread-Index: AQHV6LNXTPJ5sPPEeki3PMuG1vvLVw==
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:35:04 +0000
Message-ID: <884374EF-7488-4C00-BDB7-CE203414197E@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: fr-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.22.0.200209
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=evyncke@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c1:36:40ba:933b:a7c0:5ae]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 749bf317-a912-4d6c-cdc6-08d7b6ca79f9
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR11MB1818:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR11MB1818D370A37E51EA35B58DA8A9120@DM5PR11MB1818.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0320B28BE1
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(136003)(39860400002)(366004)(376002)(396003)(346002)(189003)(199004)(81156014)(81166006)(6512007)(4326008)(8676002)(2906002)(86362001)(6486002)(36756003)(71200400001)(966005)(478600001)(6506007)(66476007)(54906003)(186003)(66946007)(66556008)(5660300002)(76116006)(91956017)(66446008)(64756008)(2616005)(316002)(110136005)(8936002)(33656002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DM5PR11MB1818; H:DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: MBN1/N6D1gwlOghmsaP2sOHD/dqQHDKfszeyBjuPKGPJryG42YDghP1nBeh9P4Y56TKtly6WEc6g4YtBlz8upRogUM+19baZwwf6UHMBqTXfRyVOr6lZSt2bUZvJHunZ3VvCouIyERSf5H6PNV1F6+ojr/YL8Px3tftGpKNaZKndGm60EOpjqpHZ4xHylJacc4dkseVKrPuUZA54pCqKhQ==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_884374EF74884C00BDB7CE203414197Eciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 749bf317-a912-4d6c-cdc6-08d7b6ca79f9
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Feb 2020 12:35:04.1917 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: PGN3eupyEYeavvp5nYapcFFiaR07ZuH63DKD0OD1e0Y7EvTHS7/cCZ+jey5Ldb+uzb3KTQcpQi1DIvDGv8VhGw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR11MB1818
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.12, xch-aln-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-7.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/Y07Wmzxbn0eXeTj1K2w-RXv8v7E>
Subject: [Hipsec] Re-doing the IESG ballot for draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:35:09 -0000

Hi,

The first IESG ballot for the draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal was done in May 2018 and was blocked by a couple of DISCUSS by the 2018 IESG. The main issue IMHO was around “why not reusing plain ICE?”; the authors in discussion with Adam Roach have provided an applicability statement and a justification on why “plain ICE” does not work efficiently when combined with HIP + additional text or replies for the remaining DISCUSS & COMMENT.

The diff are https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-30&url1=draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-28

I have reviewed all COMMENT and DISCUSS from 2 years ago and it appears to me that they are all addressed (including those from 2018 AD who are no more AD in 2020 – they are in cc). The changes in the document are minor and I am confident that neither a WG Last Call not an IETF Last Call is required. I am therefore placing the document in the next IESG telechat and opening a new IESG ballot.

Thank you for the authors on their energy to keep the document useful,

Regards,

-éric

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status