IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-00.txt

Samu Varjonen <samu.varjonen@helsinki.fi> Mon, 26 August 2013 11:45 UTC

Return-Path: <samu.varjonen@helsinki.fi>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73A4711E8186 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 04:45:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MpnjJECUzZFD for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 04:45:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from argo.otaverkko.fi (argo.ipv6.otaverkko.fi [IPv6:2a02:4880:10:1000::2:25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A163211E818D for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 04:45:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.214.114.189] (whx-12.pc.hiit.fi [128.214.114.189]) by argo.otaverkko.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45B5421FFC; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 14:45:24 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <521B3FD4.6030500@helsinki.fi>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 14:45:24 +0300
From: Samu Varjonen <samu.varjonen@helsinki.fi>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130804 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Henderson, Thomas R" <thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com>
References: <20130401183023.13191.54752.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <515BE4B3.5070302@helsinki.fi> <758141CC3D829043A8C3164DD3D593EA2ED6C951D5@XCH-NW-16V.nw.nos.boeing.com>
In-Reply-To: <758141CC3D829043A8C3164DD3D593EA2ED6C951D5@XCH-NW-16V.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "hipsec@ietf.org" <hipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 11:45:31 -0000

On 01/07/13 16:25, Henderson, Thomas R wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: hipsec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:hipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On
>> Behalf Of Samu Varjonen
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 1:14 AM
>> To: hipsec@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-00.txt
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have some cycles that I can use to get this document forward. This is
>> the initial submission it does not differ from the RFC6253. What would
>> be the next steps for this document? Has anyone raised any
>> comments/questions that should be fixed before this can be taken
>> forward? To my knowledge there are none.
>
>
> Samu,
> I reviewed this draft, compared it with the RFC, and found some small editorial differences (perhaps applied by the RFC Editor) that should be reapplied, in my opinion.   Also, the document should point to the bis version of RFC5201.  I'll send those to you off list.  Other than that, I do not think any changes are needed and I think that this is ready for WGLC.
>

Hi,

sorry for the delay. I will include the nits in to the next revision.

BR,
Samu

> - Tom
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email