IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-04.txt

Derek Fawcus <dfawcus+lists-hipsec@employees.org> Thu, 22 October 2015 22:55 UTC

Return-Path: <dfawcus@employees.org>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACDFE1B2F9C for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 15:55:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w8BZWFfuDSGy for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 15:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cowbell.employees.org (cowbell.employees.org [IPv6:2001:1868:a000:17::142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1BF51B2F9B for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 15:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cowbell.employees.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cowbell.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CBC3D789C for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 15:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=employees.org; h=date:from :to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; s=selector1; bh=SjPo2YXvdVwO3yMhh+Px4NR2mFk=; b=om B5x9vtrQygKTA4jJ9ho+eNNGxf0EGkGVMFoMWmslNtA1qRHmHO/6tBYKv1f0K8XI jRQfwhkSswCBTtNXlKT+LO7JHecmtNVn8RtCer2RIh4gXRhjqGGCdXcHamCKx8vo DrhqbgFpUZteImVyEg9yR3YHoE4vzBoR9mcNl/O/E=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=employees.org; h=date:from :to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; q=dns; s=selector1; b=YhrzAOEVz+Sk80GgiuNIaD0W/FRb C9MeeafnZTnA75pwJxIm3mkV695c6DJedFIgJwGAWN6q23pQn/AiKQoq17Fx6wAq 8hz+6zpwJenws7Qv/qnlaWPHbnpqkiXdf7MKL5l4bHEw4M84GcD/ZI8DCw8rdY54 YhkCHvTZh/CN1A0=
Received: by cowbell.employees.org (Postfix, from userid 1736) id 3EC5AD7892; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 15:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 23:55:45 +0100
From: Derek Fawcus <dfawcus+lists-hipsec@employees.org>
To: hipsec@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20151022225545.GC31636@cowbell.employees.org>
Mail-Followup-To: hipsec@ietf.org
References: <20150922105852.742.47701.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <560E5953.90002@ericsson.com> <561B7657.4020004@helsinki.fi> <561B806B.1080109@cs.hut.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <561B806B.1080109@cs.hut.fi>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/ZdMRns286aZyT0ektmKugWkzQ9E>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-04.txt
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 22:55:47 -0000

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:42:03PM +0300, Miika Komu wrote:
> 
> I don't have a strong opinion, but I guess SPKI should be dropped since 
> the HIP CERT work is going proceed to the standards track.

IMO it'd be a pity to drop the SPKI stuff,  as I found it easier to
understand and parse than the x509 encoding, but if no one is using it...

DF

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email