Re: [Hipsec] Fwd: IPR Disclosure: Certicom Corp's Statement of IPR Related todraft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-05

Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com> Fri, 13 September 2013 15:48 UTC

Return-Path: <rgm@htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E69121E80D3 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 08:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FGSSfpP8SrLL for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 08:48:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from klovia.htt-consult.com (klovia.htt-consult.com [IPv6:2607:f4b8:3:0:218:71ff:fe83:66b9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D1321E80CA for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 08:48:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by klovia.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A4262A6D; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:48:00 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at localhost
Received: from klovia.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (klovia.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o3IfhyIWCbE7; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:47:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lx120e2.htt-consult.com (lx120e2.htt-consult.com [208.83.67.155]) (Authenticated sender: rgm@htt-consult.com) by klovia.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D6EFA62A91; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:47:49 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <523333A0.2040409@htt-consult.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:47:44 -0400
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
References: <4DB9D913.1070805@htt-consult.com> <4DCAF664.8020506@htt-consult.com> <51E517AE.3030400@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <51E517AE.3030400@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "hipsec@ietf.org" <hipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Fwd: IPR Disclosure: Certicom Corp's Statement of IPR Related todraft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-05
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:48:08 -0000

On 07/16/2013 05:51 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> following up on this old IPR disclosure, even though the spec now
> mandates a co-factor of 1, I have not seen any updated to the IPR
> disclosure. Do you know anything else about this? What about the other
> two patents referenced in the disclosure?

I believe that 5201-bis is technically correct and independent of the 
disclosed IPR.


>
> Thanks,
>
> Gonzalo
>
> On 11/05/2011 11:49 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> In some conversations here at IEEE 802 wireless interim, we have 'worked
>> out' that the first patent deals with EC co-factors greater than 1.
>> Although all of the curves we currently specify have a co-factor of 1,
>> we do not state anything about the co-factor in the standard.
>>
>> We only need to explicitly limit 5201-bis (and HIP-DEX) to curves with a
>> co-factor of 1 and avoid the first patent.
>>
>> Once we work out text on the co-factor, I guess I will send it to my old
>> IPsec buddy, Tony Rosati, and see if it addresses their position (I
>> understand other standards limit the co-factor to a value of 1).
>>
>> We are still trying to figure out the others. I hope I can get help on
>> working through them.
>>
>> On 04/28/2011 02:16 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>> I just received the following:
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: IETF Secretariat [mailto:ietf-ipr@ietf.org]
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 4:50 PM
>>> To: robert.moskowitz@icsalabs.com; heer@cs.rwth-aachen.de;
>>> petri.jokela@nomadiclab.com; thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com
>>> Cc: rdroms.ietf@gmail.com; jari.arkko@piuha.net;
>>> "hipsec@ietf.orgdward"@juniper.net; gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com;
>>> ipr-announce@ietf.org; housley@vigilsec.com
>>> Subject: IPR Disclosure: Certicom Corp's Statement of IPR Related
>>> todraft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-05
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear Robert Moskowitz, Tobias Heer, Petri Jokela, Tom Henderson:
>>>
>>> An IPR disclosure that pertains to your Internet-Draft entitled "Host
>>> Identity
>>> Protocol Version 2 (HIPv2)" (draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis) was submitted
>>> to the
>>> IETF Secretariat on 2011-04-17 and has been posted on the "IETF Page of
>>> Intellectual Property Rights Disclosures"
>>> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1541/). The title of the IPR
>>> disclosure is
>>> "Certicom Corp's Statement of IPR Related to
>>> draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-05."");
>>>
>>> The IETF Secretariat
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Hipsec mailing list
>>> Hipsec@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hipsec mailing list
>> Hipsec@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
>>
>