[Hipsec] 5202-bis and IESG Note

Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com> Thu, 03 March 2011 14:13 UTC

Return-Path: <rgm@htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E730B3A68B9 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 06:13:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vssCwVtwNVD3 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 06:13:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from klovia.htt-consult.com (klovia.htt-consult.com []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 278FC3A68AD for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 06:13:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown []) by klovia.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 716706293D for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 14:13:57 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at localhost
Received: from klovia.htt-consult.com ([]) by localhost (klovia.htt-consult.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zfx+marOR7wo for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 09:13:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nc2400.htt-consult.com (nc2400.htt-consult.com []) (Authenticated sender: rgm@htt-consult.com) by klovia.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 141F262A6D for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 09:13:38 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4D6FA211.3000107@htt-consult.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 09:13:37 -0500
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv: Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "hipsec@ietf.org" <hipsec@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Hipsec] 5202-bis and IESG Note
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 14:13:21 -0000

In 5202 bis, there is an IESG note that we MUST address in 5202-bis.

I am asking everyone here to look at this note and, particularly those 
that have implemented 5202, to work out how to address this issue in 

I have also reviewed the documents for the use of the word 'future'.  We 
need some fix up in 5202-bis wrt this.  I THINK all occurances of 
'future' are ok in the other drafts.

We particularly need to check for consistancy between the drafts.  
Wording used across multiple drafts needs to be consistant (separately, 
I copied LOTS of text from 5201-bis for HIP-DEX and now after lots of 
edits to 5201-bis, I need to edit the HIP-DEX draft).