[Hipsec] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-09: (with COMMENT)

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 06 July 2016 01:37 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietf.org
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D5D12B016; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:37:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.25.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20160706013706.22302.59656.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 18:37:06 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/bnZwsd1Vh7VP2jFPBWW5tlr5kjg>
Cc: hipsec@ietf.org, draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis@ietf.org, hip-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [Hipsec] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 01:37:06 -0000

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Please replicate the appropriate info from the RFC 5205 IANA
considerations. The similar section in this draft does not seem to stand
alone. Readers should not need to refer back to the obsoleted RFC to
understand this version.