Re: [Hipsec] Operations Directorate Review of draft-ietf-hip-via-01 by 2010-06-11
"Bert (IETF) Wijnen" <bertietf@bwijnen.net> Fri, 11 June 2010 14:04 UTC
Return-Path: <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809263A69F2; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 07:04:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.019
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.279, BAYES_20=-0.74]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WUj7fnwCeaeg; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 07:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from postgirl.ripe.net (postgirl.ipv6.ripe.net [IPv6:2001:610:240:11::c100:1342]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF693A69FA; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 07:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ayeaye.ripe.net ([193.0.1.103]) by postgirl.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bertietf@bwijnen.net>) id 1ON4qh-0002p8-3w; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:04:49 +0200
Received: from vifa-1.office-lb-1.ripe.net ([193.0.1.5] helo=BWMACBOOK.local) by ayeaye.ripe.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <bertietf@bwijnen.net>) id 1ON4qg-0006mG-V8; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:04:43 +0200
Message-ID: <4C12427A.6010509@bwijnen.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:04:42 +0200
From: "Bert (IETF) Wijnen" <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com, Ari.Keranen@ericsson.com
References: <B83FC4F8B97A429294ED703EB1F3CF94@china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <B83FC4F8B97A429294ED703EB1F3CF94@china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RIPE-Signature: 86ab03e524994f79ca2c75a176445dd4911f793a62bd16c292567247edd5283a
X-RIPE-Spam-Level: ----
X-RIPE-Signature: 86ab03e524994f79ca2c75a176445dd4911f793a62bd16c292567247edd5283a
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:41:20 -0700
Cc: ops-dir@ietf.org, hipsec@ietf.org, Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Operations Directorate Review of draft-ietf-hip-via-01 by 2010-06-11
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:04:52 -0000
Hi, I have reviewed this document As a member of the Operations Directorate. Specifically we look at operational and management aspects. Not that I am not on the HPI wg mailing list. The document describes 2 extensions to the HIP protocol and adds one notification. I think the document is clear in terms of protocol spec. W.r.t. if/how/when to use these extensions it states: 3. Protocol Definitions The multi-hop routing extensions may be used in different contexts and whether a new HIP packet should, for example, include a Via list or have different options enabled, can depend on the particular use case, local policies, and different protocols using the extension. This section defines how the new parameters are handled, but when to use these extensions is out of scope for this document. So it leaves that up to another document. Is there such a document? Such would be (in my view) operational aspects. But they are claimed to be out of scope. I leave it up to our OPS ADs to decide if that is problematic or not. Bert Wijnen Tina TSOU wrote: > Hello, > As a member of the Operations Directorate you are being asked to review > the following draft which is in IETF last call for it's operational > impact. > IETF Last Call: > The file can be obtained via > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-hip-via-01.txt > > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=19355&rfc_flag=0 > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=19355&rfc_flag=0> > > Please provide comments and review to the Ops-dir mailing list > (ops-dir@ietf.org) before 2010-06-11, and include the authors of the > draft as well. > For a list of questions to be answered in an OPS-DIR review see Appendix A > in RFC 5706. Note that not all questions may apply to all documents, and > some other items may be identified by the OPS-DIR reviews. > The status of Operations Directorate Review could be found > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/ops/trac/wiki/Directorates > or > http://merlot.tools.ietf.org/tools/art/opsdir/index.cgi/t=4904/welcome > You could update the wiki page when you finish the review. > Thank you, > Tina > http://tinatsou.weebly.com/contact.html
- Re: [Hipsec] Operations Directorate Review of dra… Bert (IETF) Wijnen
- Re: [Hipsec] Operations Directorate Review of dra… Ari Keränen
- Re: [Hipsec] Operations Directorate Review of dra… Bert Wijnen (IETF)