Re: [Hipsec] Antwort: Re: clarification on HIT Suite IDs

Tom Henderson <tomh@tomh.org> Thu, 09 October 2014 06:23 UTC

Return-Path: <tomh@tomh.org>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC5971A9109 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 23:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.667
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sSd1TygovsKF for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 23:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy3-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy3-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.30.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E9441A9108 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 23:23:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 4757 invoked by uid 0); 9 Oct 2014 06:23:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw3) (10.0.90.84) by gproxy3.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 9 Oct 2014 06:23:47 -0000
Received: from box528.bluehost.com ([74.220.219.128]) by cmgw3 with id 10Pc1p00H2molgS010PfjU; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 06:23:46 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=F6LEKMRN c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=K/474su/0lCI2gKrDs9DLw==:117 a=K/474su/0lCI2gKrDs9DLw==:17 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=f5113yIGAAAA:8 a=ZSdzdHkL1-cA:10 a=q7J0aIbBmN8A:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=HYWc1YUsAAAA:8 a=IA_2sfgTpx8A:10 a=rREcAdlOb-AA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=YriUG0bCzAKuYgWAVIUA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=WyxMGLgPp9AA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tomh.org; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=9KzpyD8v5qMiSX4yZzMxJcnR6KkfglecUsKq1MgkMN0=; b=qHIjB0iApSXgsjDeMXzOhO0mmzLyD2hTkRadAm/2lF6b3611CVg8UCOH3mqHwuBDG/34+hQqOwO+UiR6n5uDEXOEFnzLUVgznH8KwPSj9jz/cvVtXqnv/Nhqr/ip9ktO;
Received: from [71.231.123.189] (port=52940 helo=[192.168.168.42]) by box528.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <tomh@tomh.org>) id 1Xc78T-0000Qg-DO; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 00:23:37 -0600
Message-ID: <543629E6.8030802@tomh.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 23:23:34 -0700
From: Tom Henderson <tomh@tomh.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <5420863E.1060608@tomh.org> <20140922212826.5048E216C3B@bikeshed.isc.org> <54210668.4050605@tomh.org> <20140923112746.EA16C216C3B@bikeshed.isc.org> <OFD6408C65.060C7582-ONC1257D62.005816DE-C1257D62.0059BBB9@belden.com> <542991A8.4020908@tomh.org> <CAE_dhjtRkfx+hZ512d1+CMCdpJJx8-ja4nwT=XAi_YC68L4LcA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAE_dhjtRkfx+hZ512d1+CMCdpJJx8-ja4nwT=XAi_YC68L4LcA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {3122:box528.bluehost.com:tomhorg:tomh.org} {sentby:smtp auth 71.231.123.189 authed with tomh@tomh.org}
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/eUHefgLrWpvomMs0co47af4nhg0
Cc: HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>, Francis Dupont <fdupont@isc.org>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Antwort: Re: clarification on HIT Suite IDs
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 06:23:51 -0000

I've created a preview draft version 20 that makes the changes described 
in this post:

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/current/msg03975.html

I also created a diff file between -19 and -20-pre and trimmed out the 
non-substantive parts.

I attached both of these files to this ticket, for review:
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/hip/trac/ticket/51

If there is WG consensus to request to make these changes, then I'll ask 
for guidance on what to do next (publish a new draft, or handle another 
way).

- Tom