Re: [Hipsec] NAT traversal and the standards track work
Tobias Heer <heer@cs.rwth-aachen.de> Mon, 26 April 2010 10:05 UTC
Return-Path: <heer@informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24863A6B61 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 03:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HELO_MISMATCH_DE=1.448, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kFiIlswNOXGE for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 03:05:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta-2.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de (mta-2.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.7.73]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09E33A6902 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 03:05:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Received: from ironport-out-2.rz.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.5.41]) by mta-2.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.de (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008)) with ESMTP id <0L1H000IDAP7URB0@mta-2.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.de> for hipsec@ietf.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 12:05:31 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,272,1270418400"; d="scan'208";a="29094627"
Received: from relay-auth-2.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de (HELO relay-auth-2) ([134.130.7.79]) by ironport-in-2.rz.rwth-aachen.de with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 12:05:32 +0200
Received: from informatik-lufgi-4-137-226-59-251.nn.rwth-aachen.de ([unknown] [137.226.59.251]) by relay-auth-2.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-3.01 64bit (built Dec 9 2008)) with ESMTPA id <0L1H00JJ9AP7DJ50@relay-auth-2.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de> for hipsec@ietf.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 12:05:31 +0200 (CEST)
From: Tobias Heer <heer@cs.rwth-aachen.de>
In-reply-to: <7CC566635CFE364D87DC5803D4712A6C4CE8C27305@XCH-NW-10V.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 12:06:25 +0200
Message-id: <2D4CC47B-D38B-41EE-8D39-AF3B76986CDE@cs.rwth-aachen.de>
References: <4BCDA1BC.1020701@ericsson.com> <7CC566635CFE364D87DC5803D4712A6C4CE8C27305@XCH-NW-10V.nw.nos.boeing.com>
To: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
Cc: HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] NAT traversal and the standards track work
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:05:47 -0000
Am 26.04.2010 um 06:51 schrieb Henderson, Thomas R: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: hipsec-bounces@ietf.org >> [mailto:hipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gonzalo Camarillo >> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 5:45 AM >> To: HIP >> Subject: [Hipsec] NAT traversal and the standards track work >> >> Hi, >> >> we need to decide what to do with NAT traversal when moving to the >> standards track. We have the following drafts: >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-nat-traversal/ >> >> The draft above will soon become an Experimental RFC. >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-keranen-hip-native-nat- >> traversal/ >> >> The draft above proposes implementing HIP-based connectivity checks >> instead of STUN-based ones. >> >> http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-melen-hip-nat-mm-00.txt >> >> The draft above, which needs to be revised, describes the mobility and >> multihoming extensions for NAT traversal. >> >> I would like to hear people's views on what to do here. >> > > Gonzalo, I would like to see both topics (NAT traversal, and mobility management aspects of NAT traversal) on the revised charter, as the second phase of standards-track work, as we discussed in Anaheim. I am neutral on the questions of which one of the two drafts to adopt (if a choice needs to be made now) and on whether the nat-mm draft should remain separate or should be combined into one NAT traversal draft. > I share Tom's opinion here. I would like to see both progress (provided there is enough manpower to support both). However, I think it might be useful to address mobility in the actual NAT documents since it poses special challenges that are special to NATs. Tobias > - Tom > _______________________________________________ > Hipsec mailing list > Hipsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec -- Dipl.-Inform. Tobias Heer, Ph.D. Student Distributed Systems Group RWTH Aachen University, Germany tel: +49 241 80 207 76 web: http://ds.cs.rwth-aachen.de/members/heer
- [Hipsec] NAT traversal and the standards track wo… Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] NAT traversal and the standards trac… Miika Komu
- Re: [Hipsec] NAT traversal and the standards trac… Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] NAT traversal and the standards trac… Miika Komu
- Re: [Hipsec] NAT traversal and the standards trac… Ari Keranen
- Re: [Hipsec] NAT traversal and the standards trac… Henderson, Thomas R
- Re: [Hipsec] NAT traversal and the standards trac… Tobias Heer
- Re: [Hipsec] NAT traversal and the standards trac… Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] NAT traversal and the standards trac… Jan Melen
- Re: [Hipsec] NAT traversal and the standards trac… Ari Keranen
- Re: [Hipsec] NAT traversal and the standards trac… Gonzalo Camarillo