[Hipsec] Status
Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Wed, 15 September 2010 10:19 UTC
Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E9B3A6A3C for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 03:19:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.135
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.135 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.464, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 313TVlup9yLM for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 03:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (mailgw9.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.57]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB4523A6B91 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 03:18:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb39-b7b91ae000001aef-50-4c909dab3786
Received: from esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id A1.82.06895.BAD909C4; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 12:19:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.172]) by esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 15 Sep 2010 12:19:23 +0200
Received: from [131.160.126.132] ([131.160.126.132]) by esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 15 Sep 2010 12:19:23 +0200
Message-ID: <4C909DAA.2010800@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:19:22 +0300
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Sep 2010 10:19:23.0162 (UTC) FILETIME=[77903FA0:01CB54BF]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: [Hipsec] Status
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 10:19:02 -0000
Folks, note that according to our charter, we are supposed to start WGLCs on the following documents pretty soon: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/hip/charter/ Sep 2010 WGLC RFC4423bis Sep 2010 WGLC Certs in HIP base exchange specification Sep 2010 WGLC RFC4843bis Sep 2010 WGLC RFC5201bis Sep 2010 WGLC RFC5202bis At this point, draft-ietf-hip-rfc5202-bis-00 does not even exist. Also, as reflected in our charter, we had agreed to separate the mobility and multihoming parts of rfc5206bis: Dec 2010 WGLC the mobility portion of RFC5206bis Feb 2011 WGLC the multihoming portion of RFC5206bis At this point, draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-00 includes both. We are also missing a bis draft for the NAT traversal spec (rfc5770bis), although that is not urgent... yet :o) Thanks, Gonzalo
- [Hipsec] Status Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] Status Ari Keranen
- Re: [Hipsec] Status Gonzalo Camarillo