[Hipsec] Looking for a list of hashes and MACs
Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com> Tue, 04 August 2009 07:25 UTC
Return-Path: <rgm@htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67EDF3A67F0 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 00:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Quarantine-ID: <5EnJns3bekVh>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER, Duplicate header field: "References"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5EnJns3bekVh for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 00:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [208.83.67.147]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C653A6884 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 00:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n747PhZu002224 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 03:25:43 -0400
Received: from nc2400.htt-consult.com (onlo.htt-consult.com [208.83.67.148]) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Scalix SMTP Relay 11.3.0.11339) via ESMTP; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 03:25:08 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 10:25:06 +0300
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com>
To: hipsec@ietf.org
Message-ID: <4A77E252.8020206@htt-consult.com>
In-Reply-To: <8F346BB1-D5EF-419F-AED7-A0DE8DFEECE0@indranet.co.nz>
References: <4A72AF52.90603@htt-consult.com>
References: <8F346BB1-D5EF-419F-AED7-A0DE8DFEECE0@indranet.co.nz>
x-scalix-Hops: 1
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090625)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: [Hipsec] Looking for a list of hashes and MACs
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 07:25:49 -0000
I am looking for a list of hashes and MACs for discussion purposes (ie starting point). Hashes, all I am finding is the SHA varients: SHA-1, 224, 256, 384, & 512. I ASSuME that we are awaiting results of the Hash competition for more... For MACs, I found: http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/STM/cavp/index.html which lists CMAC, CCM. GMAC, & HMAC with MAC depricated. (http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/ST/toolkit/message_auth.html only lists MAC & HMAC). If we add ESP-CCM due to the prevalence of CCM in wireless systems, adding CCM for the MAC seems a 'smart' move. But what about others? What are our hashing alternatives? For example could you run CCM with a key of ZERO for a CCM hash to generate the HIT? From discussions I have had, CCM works well with small packet size like found in 802.15.4 where the maximum datagram is 127 bytes. (or perhaps there is research of a key value that generates a 'good' CCM hash?). Just doing a little headscratching here.
- [Hipsec] Building the first list of to Standards … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [Hipsec] Building the first list of to Standa… Robert Moskowitz
- [Hipsec] Looking for a list of hashes and MACs Robert Moskowitz
- [Hipsec] Which EC for DH Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [Hipsec] Which EC for DH Oleg Ponomarev
- Re: [Hipsec] Building the first list of to Standa… Andrew McGregor
- Re: [Hipsec] Building the first list of to Standa… Miika Komu
- Re: [Hipsec] Building the first list of to Standa… Miika Komu