IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS

Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Mon, 17 January 2011 13:51 UTC

Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 407E328C0D9 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 05:51:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.614
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.614 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.015, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jkjfd0TZAg47 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 05:51:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (mailgw10.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.61]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E27603A6CAA for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 05:51:08 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3d-b7b89ae0000036a3-96-4d3449e55858
Received: from esessmw0197.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 52.07.13987.5E9443D4; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:53:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [131.160.126.246] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0197.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.88) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.2.234.1; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:53:39 +0100
Message-ID: <4D3449E3.50904@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:53:39 +0200
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:51:10 -0000

Hi,

in our last charter update, we decided to move the certs draft to the
standards track:

o Specify in a standards track RFC how to carry certificates in the
base exchange. This was removed from the base HIP spec so that the
mechanism is specified in a stand-alone spec.

However, I would like to double-check with the group. If we intend to
specify all this in 5201 bis anyway, it may make sense to publish this
as an Experimental RFC. If we want 5201bis to reference this spec, then
it needs to be PS. I would like to get your opinions on this issue?

Thanks,

Gonzalo

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status