[Hipsec] Comments on RFC5203bis and RFC6253bis
Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Fri, 19 June 2015 07:06 UTC
Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 209401A6F3B for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:06:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5ZVZpJOnHLjN for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg23.ericsson.net (sesbmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB63B1A6F39 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-f79b66d000001131-ef-5583bf80290a
Received: from ESESSHC010.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by sesbmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 18.CF.04401.08FB3855; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:06:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [131.160.126.2] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.210.2; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:06:39 +0200
Message-ID: <5583BF80.8060304@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:06:40 +0300
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrKJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvrW7D/uZQg+NXTC2mLprM7MDosWTJ T6YAxigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujA0dC9gL5rBVPOnfz9jAOI21i5GTQ0LARGLl8h1MELaYxIV7 69m6GLk4hASOMkpcnDuRBcJZzShx/MF6oCoODl4BbYkTf5NAGlgEVCV+nXrMDGKzCVhIbLl1 nwXEFhWIkpj49RCYzSsgKHFy5hMwW0RAUqLn7lIwW1hAT2Jj+3d2kJHMApoS63fpg4SZBeQl mrfOBhspBLRp+bMWlgmMfLOQTJqF0DELSccCRuZVjKLFqcVJuelGxnqpRZnJxcX5eXp5qSWb GIHhdHDLb9UdjJffOB5iFOBgVOLhVVBrChViTSwrrsw9xCjNwaIkzjtjc16okEB6Yklqdmpq QWpRfFFpTmrxIUYmDk6pBkYNRb9ZGRdP1so8cinturFh/72o/nXhvZn3eGziFgaomJy+wbfX 1iMuQ/tWzqcu5y/n5y6trvrOcqTQg+3kDpsHjgeecJ3wmikv8FzB8W7KZmOW/Wa2xcVvTwvc 8Uzt+hr//UFH14cPdgqq1plrSnPf305/spi36khTG+sJtdMRlcc/MWo43VJiKc5INNRiLipO BAAwmTuDCAIAAA==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/hJLaLmdfXuSevXy14cNRxCSOr6c>
Subject: [Hipsec] Comments on RFC5203bis and RFC6253bis
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 07:06:45 -0000
Authors of RFC5203bis and RFC6253bis, the RFC5203bis document has a Normative reference to RFC6263bis: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-08#section-3.3 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-01 RFC 6253bis is an expired document. First we need to revise it so that it re-appears in the IETF archives. Additionally, since it is a normative dependency of RFC5203bis, we should include it in the publication batch we are currently working on (RFC5203bis, RFC5204bis, and RFC5205bis). Authors of RFC6253, could you please provide the WG with am update on your plans to revise this document? Authors of RFC5203bis, could you please update the following outdated reference? draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis -> RFC 7401 Thanks, Gonzalo
- [Hipsec] Comments on RFC5203bis and RFC6253bis Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] Comments on RFC5203bis and RFC6253bis Samu Varjonen
- Re: [Hipsec] Comments on RFC5203bis and RFC6253bis Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] Comments on RFC5203bis and RFC6253bis Samu Varjonen
- Re: [Hipsec] Comments on RFC5203bis and RFC6253bis Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] Comments on RFC5203bis and RFC6253bis Samu Varjonen
- Re: [Hipsec] Comments on RFC5203bis and RFC6253bis Gonzalo Camarillo