[Hipsec] Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-32: (with COMMENT)

Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 28 July 2020 14:44 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietf.org
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 552A23A0CD6; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 07:44:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal@ietf.org, hip-chairs@ietf.org, hipsec@ietf.org, Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.10.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <159594746088.21356.7585376503791092508@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 07:44:21 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/hcUviPsn4qe-fGjFhlLBDu6e4hU>
Subject: [Hipsec] Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-32: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 14:44:22 -0000

Magnus Westerlund has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-32: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for resolving and answering my questions.

I have only one minor comment that I noticed due to that you edit the text:

Section 2:
"Following [RFC5770] and SDP [RFC3264] ..."

RFC 3264 is not SDP, it is the "Offer/Answer model with SDP" there is a
significant difference, as SDP base spec is RFC4566.