IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Hipsec] New HIP WG charter proposal

Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Sat, 01 May 2010 07:26 UTC

Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B2F3A6AA1 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 May 2010 00:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.667
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.266, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_FWDLOOK=1.666, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HHpAwrGbvII5 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 May 2010 00:26:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (mailgw10.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.61]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88DC33A6A7C for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 May 2010 00:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3d-b7be7ae000002159-0f-4bdbd77f8d69
Received: from esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 77.C3.08537.F77DBDB4; Sat, 1 May 2010 09:25:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.175]) by esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 1 May 2010 09:24:37 +0200
Received: from mail.lmf.ericsson.se ([131.160.11.50]) by esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 1 May 2010 09:24:37 +0200
Received: from [131.160.126.240] (rvi2-126-240.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.126.240]) by mail.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6444B254A for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 May 2010 10:24:37 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <4BDBD735.7050402@ericsson.com>
Date: Sat, 01 May 2010 10:24:37 +0300
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>
References: <4BDBD41E.5030107@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BDBD41E.5030107@ericsson.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080001030408090506090201"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 May 2010 07:24:37.0784 (UTC) FILETIME=[5B32C980:01CAE8FF]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] New HIP WG charter proposal
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 May 2010 07:26:08 -0000

Hi,

I have updated the charter with the RFC number of the NAT traversal spec.

Cheers,

Gonzalo

On 01/05/2010 10:11 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> as you know, we need to recharter the WG in order to move our specs to
> the standards track. I have put together a charter proposal (see
> attachment). Please, let me know if you have any comments on it.
> 
> I have used a less aggressive time frame than what was presented in in
> Anaheim:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/10mar/slides/hip-1/hip-1_files/v3_document.htm
> 
> Also, I think we have enough on our plate for now. We can add the HIP
> proxy and Diet HIP exchange work to our charter when we finish the first
> RFCs we will be working on.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Gonzalo
> HIP co-chair
>

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status