[Hipsec] HIP Native NAT Traversal
Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Fri, 09 April 2010 13:14 UTC
Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79BBA3A67FE for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 06:14:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.876
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.876 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.723, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U-BVW78+5xuJ for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 06:14:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (mailgw10.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.61]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0A363A676A for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 06:14:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3d-b7bf6ae000005bec-87-4bbf283b5d6d
Received: from esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with SMTP id 99.E7.23532.B382FBB4; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 15:14:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.175]) by esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 9 Apr 2010 15:14:34 +0200
Received: from mail.lmf.ericsson.se ([131.160.11.50]) by esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 9 Apr 2010 15:14:34 +0200
Received: from [131.160.37.44] (EV001E681B5FE2.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.37.44]) by mail.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 985E62469 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 16:14:34 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <4BBF283A.9080408@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:14:34 +0300
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Apr 2010 13:14:34.0874 (UTC) FILETIME=[9959F5A0:01CAD7E6]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: [Hipsec] HIP Native NAT Traversal
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 13:14:47 -0000
Hi, in Anaheim, we decided to continue discussing on the list the following draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-keranen-hip-native-nat-traversal/ In particular, I would like to see discussions on the lessons learned from the STUN-based implementations and potential benefits of implementing STUN-like functionality in HIP. Thanks, Gonzalo HIP WG co-chair
- [Hipsec] HIP Native NAT Traversal Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] HIP Native NAT Traversal Miika Komu
- Re: [Hipsec] HIP Native NAT Traversal Ari Keranen
- Re: [Hipsec] HIP Native NAT Traversal Dan Wing
- Re: [Hipsec] HIP Native NAT Traversal frogsir
- Re: [Hipsec] HIP Native NAT Traversal Miika Komu
- Re: [Hipsec] HIP Native NAT Traversal Dan Wing
- Re: [Hipsec] HIP Native NAT Traversal Ari Keranen
- Re: [Hipsec] HIP Native NAT Traversal Dan Wing
- Re: [Hipsec] HIP Native NAT Traversal frogsir
- Re: [Hipsec] HIP Native NAT Traversal Dan Wing