Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting?
Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Mon, 31 May 2010 14:11 UTC
Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D8453A6A43 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 May 2010 07:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.459
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.459 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.460, BAYES_50=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YAsToeXEusho for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 May 2010 07:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (mailgw9.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.57]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868923A69E9 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 May 2010 07:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb39-b7b80ae000001aa1-e6-4c03c38ea088
Received: from esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id F8.89.06817.E83C30C4; Mon, 31 May 2010 16:11:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.174]) by esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 31 May 2010 16:11:26 +0200
Received: from [131.160.126.212] ([131.160.126.212]) by esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 31 May 2010 16:11:26 +0200
Message-ID: <4C03C38D.3000408@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 17:11:25 +0300
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Henderson, Thomas R" <thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com>
References: <4BFAA6B0.6070806@ericsson.com> <4BFAE4F6.7090602@htt-consult.com> <7CC566635CFE364D87DC5803D4712A6C4CE97161CD@XCH-NW-10V.nw.nos.boeing.com>
In-Reply-To: <7CC566635CFE364D87DC5803D4712A6C4CE97161CD@XCH-NW-10V.nw.nos.boeing.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 May 2010 14:11:26.0292 (UTC) FILETIME=[28320940:01CB00CB]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting?
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 14:11:41 -0000
Hi, it is clear we need to have the documents reviewed. However, do you expect the reviewers to find issues that will require face-to-face discussions? If we need face-to-face time, I am happy to request a slot. However, I would not like to request a slot just to show a few slides without discussions. Thanks, Gonzalo On 25/05/2010 6:36 AM, Henderson, Thomas R wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: hipsec-bounces@ietf.org >> [mailto:hipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Robert Moskowitz >> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 1:44 PM >> To: Gonzalo Camarillo >> Cc: HIP >> Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? >> >> On 05/24/2010 12:17 PM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: >>> Folks, >>> >>> we need to decide whether or not we need face-to-face time >> during the >>> next IETF. Opinions? >>> >> >> It would be 'nice' to have a serious document review at that time. >> >> There shouldn't be quite the 'hand waving' we did at Anahiem, >> but actual >> documents for people to have read over and be reading to hum on or >> supply changes. >> > > I cannot attend but I tend to agree that a review would be helpful to move things along, if you can form a quorum. > > - Tom
- [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Henderson, Thomas R
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Tobias Heer
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Robert Moskowitz
- [Hipsec] Fwd: Re: Face-to-face meeting? Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Tobias Heer
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Tobias Heer
- Re: [Hipsec] Face-to-face meeting? Gonzalo Camarillo