Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-12.txt
Jeff Ahrenholz <j.ahrenholz@temperednetworks.com> Fri, 24 June 2016 15:23 UTC
Return-Path: <j.ahrenholz@temperednetworks.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6527312D159 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 08:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WtaNNs20lqr1 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 08:23:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out.west.exch081.serverdata.net (cas081-co-10.exch081.serverdata.net [199.193.204.191]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B19012DB6F for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 08:23:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MBX081-W5-CO-2.exch081.serverpod.net (10.224.129.85) by MBX081-W5-CO-2 (10.224.129.85) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1130.7; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 08:23:06 -0700
Received: from MBX081-W5-CO-2.exch081.serverpod.net ([10.224.129.85]) by MBX081-W5-CO-2.exch081.serverpod.net ([10.224.129.85]) with mapi id 15.00.1130.005; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 08:23:06 -0700
From: Jeff Ahrenholz <j.ahrenholz@temperednetworks.com>
To: Miika Komu <miika.komu@ericsson.com>, "hipsec@ietf.org" <hipsec@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-12.txt
Thread-Index: AQHRzVleTAP7xruKpU6gf7y7RtV0i5/3khUAgAEr1QA=
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 15:23:06 +0000
Message-ID: <5C1F7EB9-3B99-47E1-A929-B79E97F56F57@temperednetworks.com>
References: <20160623141232.31224.21763.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <576BF266.4040703@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <576BF266.4040703@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [216.168.34.194]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <21B22A92BC7BAB4DAA37A6A464C77CD2@exch081.serverpod.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/jHge76wHy6zta819jjMKJxz1fQ4>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-12.txt
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 15:23:10 -0000
Hi Miika, First of all, nice work with all of your changes! This is a big draft but seems much clearer without the RFC 5770 delta. Here’s some further comments on your questions... > * What should do with compatibility with RFC 6078 (HICCUPS) I think you can omit this, since RFC 6078 is for RFC 5201 (HIPv1). (Wait until if/when 6078 is updated for HIPv2.) > * Connectivity tests should be skipped unless ESP_TRANSFORM is > negotiated? Seems like a good idea. No ESP_TRANSFORM -> no need to establish two-way comms between peers. For example, when performing a registration procedure with a relay server. > * Steps 5-6 could be skipped in the handoff sequence? See fig. 6. If steps 5-6 are skipped, then we would have no SEQ in step 3? And the subsequent connectivity checks would suffice for these steps? Below are a few editorial nits... -Jeff page 2 s/checks keepalives, and data relaying./check keepalives and data relaying./g page 7 s/IPsec [RFC3948] Finally/IPsec [RFC3948]. Finally/ page 15 s/NATs drop messages messages/NATs drop messages/ page 18 s/the the recipient/the recipient/ page 22 s/interact handover/interact with handover/ page 27 s/MUST not/MUST NOT/
- Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-native-na… Jeff Ahrenholz
- Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-native-na… Miika Komu
- Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-native-na… Jeff Ahrenholz
- Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-native-na… Jeff Ahrenholz
- Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-native-na… Miika Komu
- Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-native-na… Miika Komu
- Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-native-na… Jeff Ahrenholz
- Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-native-na… Miika Komu
- [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-tr… internet-drafts
- Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-native-na… Jeff Ahrenholz
- Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-native-na… Miika Komu