Re: [Hipsec] Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations

["Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <[e-mail]>]

Gonzalo

This is indeed a good catch about DEX, the protocol has probably changed a lot since then. So, perhaps mentioning the 2 repos (not the paper) in the write-up BUT WITH the last commit year; this is also a useful piece of information when evaluating a protocol (not saying a positive piece though ☹ ...).

As you are the doc shephers, it is really up to you to decide of course

Regards

-éric

-----Original Message-----
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <[e-mail]>
Date: Tuesday, 22 September 2020 at 12:05
To: Eric Vyncke <[e-mail]>, Miika Komu <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations

    Hi Eric,

    your email below arrived during my summer vacation. I am catching up on stuff now. 

    Please, note that the 3 links provided below point to a paper from 2013, to a repo where the last commit is from 2011, and to a repo where the last commit was performed 10 years ago. Are you sure you want that type of completely out-of-date information in the writeup?

    Cheers,

    Gonzalo

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[e-mail]>
    > Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2020 16:18
    > To: Miika Komu <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
    > Cc: Gonzalo Camarillo <[e-mail]>
    > Subject: Re: Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations
    > 
    > Thank you Miika for these pieces of information.
    > 
    > Gonzalo, as you are the document shepherd for DEX, would you mind
    > updating the write-up with this list of implementations?
    > 
    > For information, I have just request the IESG secretary to approve the HIP-
    > NAT document as all DISCUSS & COMMENT points were addressed. Now, we
    > need to get DEX through
    > 
    > -éric
    > 
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Miika Komu <[e-mail]>
    > Date: Tuesday, 4 August 2020 at 14:50
    > To: Eric Vyncke <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
    > Cc: Gonzalo Camarillo <[e-mail]>
    > Subject: Re: Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations
    > 
    >     Hi Eric,
    > 
    >     ti, 2020-07-14 kello 11:45 +0000, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) kirjoitti:
    >     > [Bcc previous and current authors in HIP related documents]
    >     >
    >     > In the framework of the IESG evaluation of HIP-DEX, it would be
    >     > useful to know whether there are implementations of HIP-DEX.
    > 
    >     sorry for not sending this earlier due to my vacations. I am aware of
    >     three implementations (no idea about interoperability):
    > 
    >     1. Contiki-based implementation
    >     https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259475424_Slimfit_-
    > _A_HIP_DEX_compression_layer_for_the_IP-based_Internet_of_Things
    > 
    >     2. Java: https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=9d0fb0d6-c3af5042-
    > 9d0ff04d-86d2114eab2f-a5a60a52da996ac0&q=1&e=533f7f17-d75e-4aff-
    > a064-
    > c679cfd0273b&u=https%3A%2F%2Fcode.google.com%2Farchive%2Fp%2Fhip-
    > dex%2F
    > 
    >     3. Java: https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=f5c05a7d-ab60bae9-
    > f5c01ae6-86d2114eab2f-d4d4be7ca0b8dbde&q=1&e=533f7f17-d75e-4aff-
    > a064-c679cfd0273b&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fjuhovh%2Fhip-
    > dex%2Ftree%2Fmaster%2FSpotHIP
    > 
    >     > In the same vein, getting a list of HIPv2 BEX (Base Exchange) would
    >     > also be useful.
    > 
    >     AFAIK, HIPv2 has been implemented and interoperated successfully by the
    >     following implementations:
    > 
    >     1. OpenHIP
    >     2. HIP for Linux
    > 
    >     (Maybe also by the HIP4Inter.net implementation but I am not sure about
    >     this)