Re: [Hipsec] Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations

"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Wed, 23 September 2020 14:20 UTC

Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931D73A0E01 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 07:20:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=kD8yOIBf; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=twAbBRo2
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NKYRnvZoz59s for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 07:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 676E63A0E00 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 07:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5268; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1600870833; x=1602080433; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=CpX94E7UlJVuRTo6KtkRRLgNBRiFFFF68RPYLGEjPrk=; b=kD8yOIBftBOzqZl5As88/2jIdnz4N1QeeKx4aj5SIg6MtfXvDphjocra WVGB/Hkm1gh1cPNV+BVnJ3NAHxEW3RuBhz1eaq2SMLLNoWsefCLr+YJO1 sLbPHN0mAgSyRFYsYSKmH0kzu0ivazqfqqz6RHWKTbU+ARBedlJv6Wsg0 8=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3A0DAcmxDI8p5sI75h/lNWUyQJPHJ1sqjoPgMT9p?= =?us-ascii?q?ssgq5PdaLm5Zn5IUjD/qw31A3ER4TQ8OlDjazdtKWzEWAD4JPUtncEfdQMUh?= =?us-ascii?q?IekswZkkQmB9LNEkz0KvPmLklYVMRPXVNo5Te3ZE5SHsutakfTqWap6jhUER?= =?us-ascii?q?L6ZkJ5I+3vEdvUiMK6n+m555zUZVBOgzywKbN/JRm7t0PfrM4T1IBjMa02jB?= =?us-ascii?q?DOpyhF?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DpGwBgWGtf/4ENJK1gHQEBAQEJARI?= =?us-ascii?q?BBQUBQIFPAoFQUQdwWS8shDqDRgONVCaYdoEvE4ERA1ULAQEBDQEBIwoCBAE?= =?us-ascii?q?BhEsCF4ITAiQ6BA0CAwEBCwEBBQEBAQIBBgRthVwMhXIBAQEBAxIREQwBATg?= =?us-ascii?q?LBAIBCBEDAQEBAwImAgICMBUICAIEARIigwQBgksDLgEOq24CgTmIYXaBMoM?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEFgTMBhAAYghAJgQ4qAYJwg2mGUhuBQT+BEScMEIJNPoJcAgIXgREBEgE?= =?us-ascii?q?hgxczgi2TNqQBCoJniHmRWQMfgwyBJ4hUlAKTAIpilR0CBAIEBQIOAQEFgW4?= =?us-ascii?q?CHjcwcHAVOyoBgj4JRxcCDY4fg3GEWYV9dDcCBgEJAQEDCXyNYwEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,293,1596499200"; d="scan'208";a="738033361"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 23 Sep 2020 14:20:31 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 08NEKVQM011595 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 23 Sep 2020 14:20:31 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 09:20:31 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 09:20:31 -0500
Received: from NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 10:20:30 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=VxlVtYKG4t5RGCec1V1VXAWdyF2PUK8yh/XlyrdJ7C3cgUCFZhZKlxKtk7kck3eBWhzjsioli0u31czHJJsl/fBtxQ4+66SfGRqctp7AuJISb1wQJ5mRd+DUkOojZXe5bVNJND+WxkIfW0RC/Saxk41OaPu72vy7aj8MlRSPlffuCq9dNOYxjkyYgbW7hM9fR+8viCBdfvGSUgWT+HPET6YGIcYmbyc04C5GCSqCtBIvE7kLSLNWXs3JssfnFGHNxoDb81knlQ1chbaqFjEsfSA6nFn7YLMr7bj7vZC3Q3Zld34YWXcXPb6yhlwGUMk8yNp1i2UZCONSX5QRUEao6w==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=CpX94E7UlJVuRTo6KtkRRLgNBRiFFFF68RPYLGEjPrk=; b=j6mWW/03BlVZapUb7B84+j6VKvDfhuDV0ysAAFs+9nUW6a+P5weJWoFN3sezM5KIxMdblUNRgIiVOjuQkbqwqvEeb2OuEyKC1/6JalArExnalZlRxk+zuZiOs4sczqYifuQFmn0eMZJyg5UdweeMTeMMAEGJcs6geZPaRGDeKHNJbEwkFkrdpCB9+WuWOaxST0crUYTnLL79u4kuo2dnCRwn4dxCzcETPXoNpCMtqQ+vdcwpeZXoy2OCMKT/dgiGMGJJYEVLKq8BsaHJUGJURzCyDREEjn4KCOTRN4bujhpt+ZX0+F86DozvzM8OXGOeemd6dZkyR6Wy0vLeiVWJeA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=CpX94E7UlJVuRTo6KtkRRLgNBRiFFFF68RPYLGEjPrk=; b=twAbBRo2PjTXAEcbsR6eHyp4Kjdw/oX0lvlZdJmO4quQ102if/jwNgVYsnaMBpzVO9fLxvxXpeaR+KCG1fFN9+SWeLRxmImNcEhtwnAGW9uLXv1cuj/L4iJu0OTEMh/o06Ce5i8AfVUDh05PPdIcB/fd5c5sswWN5grd3SEDRF8=
Received: from BN6PR11MB1844.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:404:103::20) by BN8PR11MB3634.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:88::31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3412.20; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 14:20:28 +0000
Received: from BN6PR11MB1844.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d525:a81a:74e0:12e7]) by BN6PR11MB1844.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d525:a81a:74e0:12e7%12]) with mapi id 15.20.3412.020; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 14:20:28 +0000
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>, Miika Komu <miika.komu@ericsson.com>, "hipsec@ietf.org" <hipsec@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations
Thread-Index: AQHWWdQ2QAYB1RIa4U+37oXavorC16koB92AgAA6FICATJlHgIAB/ASA
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 14:20:28 +0000
Message-ID: <C92B3DB4-00FA-4283-A80D-465B41D49F64@cisco.com>
References: <80ABF0A9-4E8C-4791-8323-790A2A313B5C@cisco.com> <7d534cff1b653f45d15db6cf8d19248080e7b4cb.camel@ericsson.com> <2A95AFF2-5283-4B93-8599-7C258FA4AE76@cisco.com> <AM5PR0701MB2996543BE5C9F34C7697527F833B0@AM5PR0701MB2996.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM5PR0701MB2996543BE5C9F34C7697527F833B0@AM5PR0701MB2996.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: fr-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.41.20091302
authentication-results: ericsson.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ericsson.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c1:36:4d6:7401:76b3:1eef]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 0d1ec65a-3a06-481d-49a2-08d85fcbd235
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN8PR11MB3634:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN8PR11MB3634A15CEA88650F7BB2C007A9380@BN8PR11MB3634.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: JNv3jRpb/518Sm1qG4XPOko0ltS5CQKEM3Z8O2vg6hJGPXfN2WggLet2Jkeu5mfr7V7VsWpLr3lkFnmjOdoi9VC3CI/eXi2BlkKiqe+KXxbzS2tlxMEA/YuL7sjK8wbgcDTTBFsoQTSToh5ZxnUESFBjTrV4umRlKomiixnHnM1P33ppqGSe6u8OD0/fNaasZlMOc3rcpkjvd6CbmOnbKfWrIznozj+1VDRrCB8gtzs/mRmagXoPpeHnj9GU14zYcfCBn8O6vMQfhp1FNfUdfdcIc3TxifsKwDzuUfUJJuXX+ycFtTeAW7txNlbAHvUqVDA7VsK9gpA0biUAreNTMNdJOCwYuz2LIuISiiG5LNCa157OPi7bopP5JNct6eTmceHWAGV5qYCysq3OqP5F6EDF/HczWdRrQZwvydIsnHvziZ4J1Zrwt0kw13NBIBSJeVTuJU4DolUBCG4Ah5lX0w==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BN6PR11MB1844.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(366004)(39860400002)(346002)(376002)(136003)(396003)(6486002)(86362001)(83380400001)(8936002)(5660300002)(33656002)(2906002)(91956017)(66556008)(76116006)(966005)(6512007)(64756008)(66946007)(66574015)(66446008)(66476007)(71200400001)(53546011)(36756003)(6506007)(8676002)(316002)(2616005)(110136005)(186003)(478600001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: HUcZ0ReVXgJRCnuV3+KAO8fteCjp5pPRLxc/hNi3bVawMjK2MDVmUKDQD04X+BywIjqL+fEUbmQzvVPLb4SFXxWIDqHJg2rO5AHaGWKTCXfsC1Uoz/9CjMHqGne+KucLui6ySnkU/Qp/kN1jKgYflHYRjMzWyovyFPre+pYcaDG0XmpBtFkj9OzJD6MS2p1jkEElduV4Ntw7f+drok6XujBHl6UR1lsXxUW9fxa+hJ4kMmVrDM2ci3RUmsDtTdKa89x2XUClQ0QhGUYBmBnnYa57dz/qF03oVOhA/0s/QRgmrXB6TjRG/B1RHSPVw4HMg1mCcj2VpvaQitVVs3YOVtC0YPMlSTNJG0oScreAeHdZqvGt7cWkz6FCDY6Ybf/45sx1V36maURgEBPh7k7OtiubZUNKGr3Tv8ruaAz47vEveUyU2v5KV/JIZlBPnWlFGrp1ImVjMo+g6ozZfnG5RpjrBs/krEk5JVPJhg0UPU2JqOBE8UOkatt06mgc+Q8qMxVNIlFm3bSVMoN0xwnOqu+bLytUdL0+/YZbFvUSutpyRzuw8/n+DvztrRGjSicVUv0oSVykJmaj2QcqCVDlndfh5HMCL/8XMXvCCV5A3N5RP1yg/WhTfavT/IYAkEjKQXL4ZCpSJufianvEdZgStNpGowxsnb2zj+skvgpcIm8u3t1GYNZpTsZ7l3LHxYO9BvG7HMpnNbv48NiDv/pPZg==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <B7267A651A55C243A6D02AA37C05B7CA@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BN6PR11MB1844.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 0d1ec65a-3a06-481d-49a2-08d85fcbd235
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 23 Sep 2020 14:20:28.1383 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: bn9UUpfJF4BpwF251MtQfeJOnHUX1ZnKkmaV9H55ZctZ0Qi0GAYR7b27gRACGGr1U2EEpyLmpzfEjLIPGYeJLw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN8PR11MB3634
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.13, xch-rcd-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-9.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/kHLzBIWB6SvqZanJ3nzgJ_WPl0M>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 14:20:36 -0000

Gonzalo

This is indeed a good catch about DEX, the protocol has probably changed a lot since then. So, perhaps mentioning the 2 repos (not the paper) in the write-up BUT WITH the last commit year; this is also a useful piece of information when evaluating a protocol (not saying a positive piece though ☹ ...).

As you are the doc shephers, it is really up to you to decide of course

Regards

-éric

-----Original Message-----
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
Date: Tuesday, 22 September 2020 at 12:05
To: Eric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>om>, Miika Komu <miika.komu@ericsson.com>om>, "hipsec@ietf.org" <hipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations

    Hi Eric,

    your email below arrived during my summer vacation. I am catching up on stuff now. 

    Please, note that the 3 links provided below point to a paper from 2013, to a repo where the last commit is from 2011, and to a repo where the last commit was performed 10 years ago. Are you sure you want that type of completely out-of-date information in the writeup?

    Cheers,

    Gonzalo

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@cisco.com>
    > Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2020 16:18
    > To: Miika Komu <miika.komu@ericsson.com>om>; hipsec@ietf.org
    > Cc: Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
    > Subject: Re: Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations
    > 
    > Thank you Miika for these pieces of information.
    > 
    > Gonzalo, as you are the document shepherd for DEX, would you mind
    > updating the write-up with this list of implementations?
    > 
    > For information, I have just request the IESG secretary to approve the HIP-
    > NAT document as all DISCUSS & COMMENT points were addressed. Now, we
    > need to get DEX through
    > 
    > -éric
    > 
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Miika Komu <miika.komu@ericsson.com>
    > Date: Tuesday, 4 August 2020 at 14:50
    > To: Eric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>om>, "hipsec@ietf.org" <hipsec@ietf.org>
    > Cc: Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
    > Subject: Re: Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations
    > 
    >     Hi Eric,
    > 
    >     ti, 2020-07-14 kello 11:45 +0000, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) kirjoitti:
    >     > [Bcc previous and current authors in HIP related documents]
    >     >
    >     > In the framework of the IESG evaluation of HIP-DEX, it would be
    >     > useful to know whether there are implementations of HIP-DEX.
    > 
    >     sorry for not sending this earlier due to my vacations. I am aware of
    >     three implementations (no idea about interoperability):
    > 
    >     1. Contiki-based implementation
    >     https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259475424_Slimfit_-
    > _A_HIP_DEX_compression_layer_for_the_IP-based_Internet_of_Things
    > 
    >     2. Java: https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=9d0fb0d6-c3af5042-
    > 9d0ff04d-86d2114eab2f-a5a60a52da996ac0&q=1&e=533f7f17-d75e-4aff-
    > a064-
    > c679cfd0273b&u=https%3A%2F%2Fcode.google.com%2Farchive%2Fp%2Fhip-
    > dex%2F
    > 
    >     3. Java: https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=f5c05a7d-ab60bae9-
    > f5c01ae6-86d2114eab2f-d4d4be7ca0b8dbde&q=1&e=533f7f17-d75e-4aff-
    > a064-c679cfd0273b&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fjuhovh%2Fhip-
    > dex%2Ftree%2Fmaster%2FSpotHIP
    > 
    >     > In the same vein, getting a list of HIPv2 BEX (Base Exchange) would
    >     > also be useful.
    > 
    >     AFAIK, HIPv2 has been implemented and interoperated successfully by the
    >     following implementations:
    > 
    >     1. OpenHIP
    >     2. HIP for Linux
    > 
    >     (Maybe also by the HIP4Inter.net implementation but I am not sure about
    >     this)