Re: [Hipsec] Fwd: IPR Disclosure: Certicom Corp's Statement of IPR Related todraft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-05

Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Tue, 16 July 2013 09:52 UTC

Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4AEF21E81DE for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 02:52:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.726
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.726 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.523, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TUSqtAkxT7Co for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 02:51:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D387A21E81D9 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 02:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7f826d000001766-5e-51e517b8b7c2
Received: from ESESSHC020.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 0B.70.05990.8B715E15; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:51:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [131.160.126.72] (153.88.183.20) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.328.9; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:51:48 +0200
Message-ID: <51E517AE.3030400@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:51:42 +0300
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com>
References: <4DB9D913.1070805@htt-consult.com> <4DCAF664.8020506@htt-consult.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DCAF664.8020506@htt-consult.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFupnluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZGfG3VneH+NNAg+/vlC2mLprMbNGw7jOj A5PH7klN7B5LlvxkCmCK4rJJSc3JLEst0rdL4MrYuXEpc8FskYrONZ3sDYw3BLoYOTkkBEwk nnevZoSwxSQu3FvP1sXIxSEkcJhR4tC874wQzmpGib3P57ODVPEKaEu8Wf6cCcRmEVCVeLfr EyuIzSZgIbHl1n0WEFtUIEqitXcqM0S9oMTJmU/A4iICWhI3r29gA7GZBdQlmnvPAc3h4BAW KJX41J4DEhYSCJT4Of0jM0iYU0BfYstebYjbJCW2vGhnh+jUk5hytYURwpaX2P52DjNEq7bE 8mctLBMYhWYhWTwLScssJC0LGJlXMbLnJmbmpJcbbWIEBurBLb9VdzDeOSdyiFGag0VJnHez 3plAIYH0xJLU7NTUgtSi+KLSnNTiQ4xMHJxSDYxCvLsc8/d4Znctb5xZ87xrRWfYJzPxtmXh HGFcPh0J568JqHq9nnBA26covT6f9Z/TgY9tu86IieSJ/Vu05dveXVUz37QIFvTUaXPsuF14 9uL02xf47OV3xC/mdK+3jHzDX1LY/eDOA2mXubMz2GPb3jWV6LfvnDDJ9iCr2kTnLfM874ab RyqxFGckGmoxFxUnAgBc6Sj0IgIAAA==
Cc: "hipsec@ietf.org" <hipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Fwd: IPR Disclosure: Certicom Corp's Statement of IPR Related todraft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-05
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:52:04 -0000

Hi Bob,

following up on this old IPR disclosure, even though the spec now
mandates a co-factor of 1, I have not seen any updated to the IPR
disclosure. Do you know anything else about this? What about the other
two patents referenced in the disclosure?

Thanks,

Gonzalo

On 11/05/2011 11:49 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> In some conversations here at IEEE 802 wireless interim, we have 'worked 
> out' that the first patent deals with EC co-factors greater than 1. 
> Although all of the curves we currently specify have a co-factor of 1, 
> we do not state anything about the co-factor in the standard.
> 
> We only need to explicitly limit 5201-bis (and HIP-DEX) to curves with a 
> co-factor of 1 and avoid the first patent.
> 
> Once we work out text on the co-factor, I guess I will send it to my old 
> IPsec buddy, Tony Rosati, and see if it addresses their position (I 
> understand other standards limit the co-factor to a value of 1).
> 
> We are still trying to figure out the others. I hope I can get help on 
> working through them.
> 
> On 04/28/2011 02:16 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> I just received the following:
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: IETF Secretariat [mailto:ietf-ipr@ietf.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 4:50 PM
>> To: robert.moskowitz@icsalabs.com; heer@cs.rwth-aachen.de;
>> petri.jokela@nomadiclab.com; thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com
>> Cc: rdroms.ietf@gmail.com; jari.arkko@piuha.net;
>> "hipsec@ietf.orgdward"@juniper.net; gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com;
>> ipr-announce@ietf.org; housley@vigilsec.com
>> Subject: IPR Disclosure: Certicom Corp's Statement of IPR Related
>> todraft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-05
>>
>>
>> Dear Robert Moskowitz, Tobias Heer, Petri Jokela, Tom Henderson:
>>
>> An IPR disclosure that pertains to your Internet-Draft entitled "Host
>> Identity
>> Protocol Version 2 (HIPv2)" (draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis) was submitted
>> to the
>> IETF Secretariat on 2011-04-17 and has been posted on the "IETF Page of
>> Intellectual Property Rights Disclosures"
>> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1541/). The title of the IPR
>> disclosure is
>> "Certicom Corp's Statement of IPR Related to
>> draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-05."");
>>
>> The IETF Secretariat
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hipsec mailing list
>> Hipsec@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Hipsec mailing list
> Hipsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
>