Re: [Hipsec] TCP port negotiation for HIP over HIP

"Henderson, Thomas R" <thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com> Wed, 27 October 2010 04:52 UTC

Return-Path: <thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89E803A67E3 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.231
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.231 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.368, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KoPj0OLQp-uV for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:52:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blv-smtpout-01.boeing.com (blv-smtpout-01.boeing.com [130.76.32.69]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0968E3A698C for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:36:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blv-av-01.boeing.com (blv-av-01.boeing.com [130.247.48.231]) by blv-smtpout-01.ns.cs.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/8.14.4/SMTPOUT) with ESMTP id o9R4bnAT016534 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blv-av-01.boeing.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blv-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id o9R4bnli009317; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from XCH-NWHT-11.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch-nwht-11.nw.nos.boeing.com [130.247.25.114]) by blv-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id o9R4bnQl009313 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=OK); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from XCH-NW-10V.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.25.83]) by XCH-NWHT-11.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.25.114]) with mapi; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:37:49 -0700
From: "Henderson, Thomas R" <thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com>
To: 'Ari Keranen' <ari.keranen@nomadiclab.com>, HIP WG <hipsec@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:37:48 -0700
Thread-Topic: [Hipsec] TCP port negotiation for HIP over HIP
Thread-Index: ActxOWBBFE/5cQQbR8WR0DDpC742VgEV0ncQ
Message-ID: <7CC566635CFE364D87DC5803D4712A6C4CEC451A74@XCH-NW-10V.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <4CC063D1.1030706@nomadiclab.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CC063D1.1030706@nomadiclab.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] TCP port negotiation for HIP over HIP
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 04:52:45 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: hipsec-bounces@ietf.org
> [mailto:hipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ari Keranen
> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 9:01 AM
> To: HIP WG
> Subject: [Hipsec] TCP port negotiation for HIP over HIP
>
> Hi all,
>
> In an off-line discussion we figured out that using a fixed TCP port
> number in the ESP TCP mode in the HIP-over-HIP draft would
> most likely
> require registering such a port with IANA (currently the draft uses
> 10500 noted as "reserved" by IANA due to same UDP port number being
> assigned for HIP NAT traversal), but since this port is never used
> outside of a HIP-initiated SA, it could be hard (and probably
> not make
> much sense) to register a port for that.
>
> Therefore, I would propose making the port number negotiable and
> piggyback it in the transport mode parameter negotiation. In practice
> the change would look something like this:
> http://users.piuha.net/akeranen/drafts/draft-ietf-hip-over-hip
> .rHEAD.xml-diff.html
>
> Opinions?
>

+1

- Tom