Re: [Hipsec] New WG item: HIP Diet EXchange (DEX)

Miika Komu <miika.komu@ericsson.com> Tue, 16 February 2016 10:42 UTC

Return-Path: <miika.komu@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5D531B2E40 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 02:42:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bQOkudq8fbGm for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 02:41:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7CBB1ACF60 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 02:41:55 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f794c6d000006f31-5f-56c2fcf1c65d
Received: from ESESSHC001.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.21]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 67.56.28465.1FCF2C65; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:41:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [131.160.36.182] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:41:52 +0100
To: <hipsec@ietf.org>
References: <56C1B871.6090000@ericsson.com>
From: Miika Komu <miika.komu@ericsson.com>
Organization: Ericsson AB
Message-ID: <56C2FCF0.9020807@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:41:52 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56C1B871.6090000@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="------------ms060703090402040206010705"
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrILMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7qO7HP4fCDFrmmFpMXTSZ2YHRY8mS n0wBjFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGb/ucBY8Nq5YvOMfYwPjKsMuRg4OCQETiY0X0roYOYFMMYkL 99azdTFycQgJHGaUWPZnLguEs4ZRYsnnqUwgVcICVhJ/12xkA7FFBEQlpnw4zQwySEhAW2Lz xyqQMJuAlsSqO9eZQWx+AUmJDQ27wWxeoJK9f1+CjWERUJX482w/mC0qECFxuLOLHaJGUOLk zCcsIDangI7Eticn2EFuYBboZpS4tWUyG8QuFYmLx4InMArMQtIyC1kZSIJZwFbiztzdzBC2 tsSyha+hbGuJGb8OQtUoSkzpfsgOYZtKvD76kRHCNpZYtu4v2wJGjlWMosWpxcW56UbGeqlF mcnFxfl5enmpJZsYgYF/cMtv3R2Mq187HmIU4GBU4uEtiDgUJsSaWFZcmXuIUQVozqMNqy8w SrHk5eelKonw/nsFlOZNSaysSi3Kjy8qzUktPsQozcGiJM67xnl9mJBAemJJanZqakFqEUyW iYNTqoFRfJvINYMN/1keXIk8e5vz7O5aoyTr1RLztthdXRVRyKd/n2nvRHH+bZf6nz5f8m1D Vpya9ofQ/3U5llHxXFctftms4CxOcsvtWh8fx7LsVOiVVZ+rklZmMRkYHvEsVOD1N2tslrzi 8IHNTHBzzzuB0NyKA7mbpj96MoNzpZBchlBjfrh1sqISS3FGoqEWc1FxIgDUPAclhAIAAA==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/mET_6mjn7XhzwrISufAsHdAtJsY>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] New WG item: HIP Diet EXchange (DEX)
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:42:31 -0000

Hi,

On 02/15/2016 01:37 PM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I have talked with our AD and he is OK with adding the following
> milestone to our charter:
>
> o Develop a standards track specification of a light-weight HIP exchange
>
> The plan would be to take the following draft as the WG item associated
> with the milestone:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-moskowitz-hip-dex/
>
> Please, let us know if you have comments (positive or negative) on this.

seems fine to me. I can review the draft when I have some free cycles.