[Hipsec] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-09: (with DISCUSS)
"Alexey Melnikov" <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm> Wed, 06 July 2016 14:22 UTC
Return-Path: <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietf.org
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8303612D57B; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 07:22:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.25.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20160706142213.7773.71894.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 07:22:13 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/m_RyCk5z2rkEIWXBmrux60MtO3k>
Cc: hipsec@ietf.org, draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis@ietf.org, hip-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [Hipsec] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-09: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 14:22:14 -0000
Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-09: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the same as Ben's DISCUSS point, but I think this is important enough to fix: Please replicate the appropriate info from the RFC 5205 IANA considerations. The similar section in this draft does not seem to stand alone. Readers should not need to refer back to the obsoleted RFC to understand this version. RFC 4648 actually has 2 base64 encodings, so you should say which section number you mean (section 4 or section 5). I suspect you meant section 5.
- Re: [Hipsec] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-i… Julien Laganier
- [Hipsec] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Hipsec] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-i… Julien Laganier
- Re: [Hipsec] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-i… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Hipsec] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-i… Julien Laganier