Re: [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS
Tobias Heer <heer@cs.rwth-aachen.de> Tue, 18 January 2011 09:10 UTC
Return-Path: <heer@informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35BB83A6E95 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 01:10:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.801
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.801 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HELO_MISMATCH_DE=1.448, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yhg34koRoyeu for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 01:10:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta-2.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de (mta-2.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.7.73]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B81C3A6DAA for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 01:10:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Received: from ironport-out-2.rz.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.5.41]) by mta-2.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.de (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008)) with ESMTP id <0LF700010O9SHP20@mta-2.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.de> for hipsec@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:13:04 +0100 (CET)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,338,1291590000"; d="scan'208";a="47109488"
Received: from relay-auth-1.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de (HELO relay-auth-1) ([134.130.7.78]) by ironport-in-2.rz.rwth-aachen.de with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:13:04 +0100
Received: from umic-i4-137-226-45-197.nn.rwth-aachen.de ([unknown] [137.226.45.197]) by relay-auth-1.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-3.01 64bit (built Dec 9 2008)) with ESMTPA id <0LF7000NBO9SHR50@relay-auth-1.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de> for hipsec@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:13:04 +0100 (CET)
From: Tobias Heer <heer@cs.rwth-aachen.de>
In-reply-to: <4D3449E3.50904@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:13:04 +0100
Message-id: <1486BB76-57BF-49A9-85A0-8136C6EC255F@cs.rwth-aachen.de>
References: <4D3449E3.50904@ericsson.com>
To: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:10:29 -0000
Hello Gonzalo, Am 17.01.2011 um 14:53 schrieb Gonzalo Camarillo: > Hi, > > in our last charter update, we decided to move the certs draft to the > standards track: > > o Specify in a standards track RFC how to carry certificates in the > base exchange. This was removed from the base HIP spec so that the > mechanism is specified in a stand-alone spec. > > However, I would like to double-check with the group. If we intend to > specify all this in 5201 bis anyway, it may make sense to publish this > as an Experimental RFC. If we want 5201bis to reference this spec, then > it needs to be PS. I would like to get your opinions on this issue? > I would be interested what the implications of PS or experimetal are for the publication of the draft. Can we publish the draft as PS with downreferences to RFC5201 now (in absence of a 5201-bis) or would we have to wait until 5201-bis is approved? If we go experimental, can we bis the cert draft later and go for PS instead? One reason why I would not like to have the certs in 5201-bis is because it is a separate issue/problem/solution and does not really belong to the _base_ documents but rather extends it. As extension it covers a well defined problem space and can stand on its own. Tobias > Thanks, > > Gonzalo > > _______________________________________________ > Hipsec mailing list > Hipsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
- [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS Miika Komu
- Re: [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS Tobias Heer
- Re: [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS Ari Keranen
- Re: [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS Tobias Heer
- Re: [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS Samu Varjonen
- Re: [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS Henderson, Thomas R
- Re: [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS Miika Komu
- Re: [Hipsec] Certs draft: experimental or PS Gonzalo Camarillo