Re: [Hipsec] Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations

"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Tue, 04 August 2020 14:17 UTC

IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:NasGOBbIzOIVw/GHIlCSdd3/LSx94ef9IxIV55w7irlHbqWk+dH4MVfC4el21QWRD4jB6vlfkO3Q9avnXD9I7ZWAtSUEd5pBH18AhN4NlgMtSMiCFQXgLfHsYiB7eaYKVFJs83yhd0QAHsH4ag7fuHy59iUVHFP0Mg8mbujwE5TZ2sKw0e368pbPYgJO0Ty6Z746LBi/oQjL8McMho43IacqwRyPqXxNKOk=
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: Miika Komu <miika.komu@ericsson.com>, "hipsec@ietf.org" <hipsec@ietf.org>
CC: Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations
Thread-Index: AQHWWdQ2QAYB1RIa4U+37oXavorC16koB92AgAA6FIA=
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 14:17:52 +0000
Message-ID: <2A95AFF2-5283-4B93-8599-7C258FA4AE76@cisco.com>
References: <80ABF0A9-4E8C-4791-8323-790A2A313B5C@cisco.com> <7d534cff1b653f45d15db6cf8d19248080e7b4cb.camel@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <7d534cff1b653f45d15db6cf8d19248080e7b4cb.camel@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: fr-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.39.20071300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <FC5B0283570B9141B39B5BB9D2C926E9@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 0d2b350b-1bab-47bf-93d8-08d838812cc2
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 Aug 2020 14:17:52.3202 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 2pBeHXMEmeNjCfQpGc8kcyUm4V4Nfkx/47uV9GwqxcJ4e070O/V3+G4Muwrz/mI/uO3d4rhb4bCdroXbiwnvLw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR11MB1298
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.12, xch-aln-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-7.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/oGrVGgovhFX7CecS6pdWfeDPMYo>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 14:18:01 -0000

Thank you Miika for these pieces of information.

Gonzalo, as you are the document shepherd for DEX, would you mind updating the write-up with this list of implementations?

For information, I have just request the IESG secretary to approve the HIP-NAT document as all DISCUSS & COMMENT points were addressed. Now, we need to get DEX through

-éric

-----Original Message-----
From: Miika Komu <miika.komu@ericsson.com>
Date: Tuesday, 4 August 2020 at 14:50
To: Eric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>, "hipsec@ietf.org" <hipsec@ietf.org>
Cc: Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations

    Hi Eric,

    ti, 2020-07-14 kello 11:45 +0000, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) kirjoitti:
    > [Bcc previous and current authors in HIP related documents]
    >  
    > In the framework of the IESG evaluation of HIP-DEX, it would be
    > useful to know whether there are implementations of HIP-DEX.

    sorry for not sending this earlier due to my vacations. I am aware of
    three implementations (no idea about interoperability):

    1. Contiki-based implementation 
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259475424_Slimfit_-_A_HIP_DEX_compression_layer_for_the_IP-based_Internet_of_Things

    2. Java: https://code.google.com/archive/p/hip-dex/

    3. Java: https://github.com/juhovh/hip-dex/tree/master/SpotHIP

    > In the same vein, getting a list of HIPv2 BEX (Base Exchange) would
    > also be useful.

    AFAIK, HIPv2 has been implemented and interoperated successfully by the
    following implementations:

    1. OpenHIP
    2. HIP for Linux

    (Maybe also by the HIP4Inter.net implementation but I am not sure about
    this)

[Hipsec] Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
Re: [Hipsec] Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations Miika Komu
Re: [Hipsec] Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
Re: [Hipsec] Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations Gonzalo Camarillo
Re: [Hipsec] Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
Re: [Hipsec] Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations Andrei Gurtov