IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Hipsec] Selection of LSI address block

Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com> Thu, 20 August 2009 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <rgm@htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F323A6F24 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.525
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.525 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.074, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hIv9oHUN3De9 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [208.83.67.147]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 808663A6FFC for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7KFEK9E024377 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:14:20 -0400
Received: from nc2400.htt-consult.com (onlo.htt-consult.com [208.83.67.148]) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Scalix SMTP Relay 11.3.0.11339) via ESMTP; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:13:30 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:13:31 -0400
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com>
To: hipsec@ietf.org
Message-ID: <4A8D681B.2080901@htt-consult.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A8C708D.4010503@htt-consult.com>
References: <4A8C708D.4010503@htt-consult.com>
x-scalix-Hops: 1
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090625)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Selection of LSI address block
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:14:56 -0000

Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> We need to come to a quick determination about what we use for LSIs.
>
> I have been asked by IANA for clearification on what HIP has been 
> using 1.0.0.0/8 for. I pointed them to the text from 4423 for now. But 
> note that Net1 has been released to the RIRs. Here is what I have been 
> told:
>
> =============================================
>
> Whichever block is selected for HIP LSIs we will need to follow the
> direction in section 4.1 of RFC 2860: 

Further along this please read:

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-iana-rfc3330bis-11.txt

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status