Re: [Hipsec] Selection of LSI address block

[Miika Komu <[e-mail]>]

Henderson, Thomas R wrote:

Hi,

>> there may be also some applications that don't scan networking and 
>> assume that all 192.168.0.0 and 10.0.0.0 networks are NATted. Such as 
>> p2p software.
> 
> good point.  Although this would be akin to a case where both peers are
> behind the same NAT, it may cause extra NAT traversal machinery to kick
> in.

btw, I am not saying that this is the right way to implement 
applications. In fact, ICE has a completely different philosophy which 
is more obvious when you think about building a large, isolate "lab" 
network from the private address range. But some apps, nevertheless, are 
just doing this even though it's "wrong".