IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Hipsec] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-hip-multihoming-11: (with COMMENT)

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 14 September 2016 12:16 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29AD412B327; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 05:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.408
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.408 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dz6EeXsZ4ZZj; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 05:16:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E6012B322; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 05:16:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE172CC9C; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:16:10 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kga-jC_ZfYyC; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:16:09 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350B22CC9B; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:16:09 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4880A146-FCDD-4135-9599-19BAB4D02ECC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <147385233558.1992.10624848840546043105.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:16:08 +0300
Message-Id: <812AA6E1-B1D9-43C8-9422-C0D997F99E79@piuha.net>
References: <147385233558.1992.10624848840546043105.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/vnO0XsdkvhcBWVrh3eqoe-7_D5o>
Cc: draft-ietf-hip-multihoming@ietf.org, hipsec@ietf.org, hip-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-hip-multihoming-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 12:16:15 -0000

Thanks for your review, Stephen.

> - I think section 6 ought note the privacy issue that
> was relatively recently with WebRTC and ICE where a
> client might not want all of it's IP addresses
> exposed, as doing so could expose the fact that the
> client e.g. is using Tor or another VPN service. The
> issue being that in some locations, that information
> may be quite sensitive.  4.2 notes this but in a quite
> opaque way, ("may be held back") but it'd be better to
> say some more.

Seems very reasonable.

> 5.1 is also relevant maybe in that it
> says one "SHOULD avoid" sending info about virtual
> interfaces. Anyway, I think it'd be good to add some
> recognition of this privacy issue to section 6. I am
> not arguing that this draft ought specify the one true
> way to avoid this problem, but only that it be
> recognised.

Yes

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email