IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Hipsec] rfc5201-bis-04 review

Ari Keranen <ari.keranen@nomadiclab.com> Mon, 07 March 2011 13:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ari.keranen@nomadiclab.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8562F3A6955 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 05:54:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.333
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.333 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.266, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y6feLHu7WLw9 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 05:54:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gw.nomadiclab.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400:101::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA8E3A67AC for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 05:54:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gw.nomadiclab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64B014E6DF for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:55:44 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at nomadiclab.com
Received: from gw.nomadiclab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (inside.nomadiclab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iXuGdovkfaAd for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:55:44 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by gw.nomadiclab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE63C4E6DC for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:55:43 +0200 (EET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
From: Ari Keranen <ari.keranen@nomadiclab.com>
In-Reply-To: <8B48650A-E9CA-4C74-90FA-4BE3860DB3A7@nomadiclab.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 15:55:44 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <33EC3BC4-8A6B-4CFE-A91A-F6746BB12F05@nomadiclab.com>
References: <B3E13881-1543-447B-B011-D5394EF086BB@nomadiclab.com> <8B48650A-E9CA-4C74-90FA-4BE3860DB3A7@nomadiclab.com>
To: HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] rfc5201-bis-04 review
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 13:54:34 -0000

Hi,

I noticed that the IANA considerations section of the 5201-bis draft refers to Obsoleted RFC2434. That should be fixed to refer to RFC5226 instead (and then "IETF consensus" should be changed into "IETF review").


Cheers,
Ari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email