Re: [Hipsec] Comments on RFC5203bis and RFC6253bis

Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Fri, 03 July 2015 08:11 UTC

Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0263D1A8FD2 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 01:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vZcyTdiOizpN for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 01:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg22.ericsson.net (sesbmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B8781A8F48 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 01:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-f79706d000007227-9f-559643bbd088
Received: from ESESSHC010.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sesbmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id F0.F2.29223.BB346955; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 10:11:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [131.160.126.36] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.210.2; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 10:11:38 +0200
Message-ID: <559643BA.6080906@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 11:11:38 +0300
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Samu Varjonen <samu.varjonen@helsinki.fi>
References: <5583BF80.8060304@ericsson.com> <55891588.80604@helsinki.fi> <559240CB.9050005@ericsson.com> <5593855C.4070002@helsinki.fi> <55938B37.4050905@ericsson.com> <20150703080207.Horde.wl-syF7jr-K1aalkYow-Xw1@webmail.helsinki.fi>
In-Reply-To: <20150703080207.Horde.wl-syF7jr-K1aalkYow-Xw1@webmail.helsinki.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrMLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvje5u52mhBueeS1pMXTSZ2eLGzxns Dkwe/Sv3s3ssWfKTKYApissmJTUnsyy1SN8ugSvjxKblTAWbRCuevGlkamA8LtjFyMkhIWAi MaHhICOELSZx4d56ti5GLg4hgaOMEvNe9zJDOKsZJZ5OOskCUsUroC3R0fqIHcRmEVCR2PK0 hw3EZhOwkNhy6z5YjahAlMTEr4eg6gUlTs58AmaLCOhKrLizg7WLkYODWUBUYvusKhBTWMBa YvaXTIhVrxglNp9YC3YQp4C/xLHNj5ggyjUl1u/SBwkzC8hLbH87hxnEFgK6ZvmzFpYJjIKz kCybhdAxC0nHAkbmVYyixanFSbnpRkZ6qUWZycXF+Xl6eaklmxiBoXpwy2+DHYwvnzseYhTg YFTi4V3wZmqoEGtiWXFl7iFGaQ4WJXHeGZvzQoUE0hNLUrNTUwtSi+KLSnNSiw8xMnFwSjUw Rj25kPB98u6TNo8Vt1yQ1nkx9crJ5kcia+vrll4U1PA8FzTF8/VyjVmG7z2n/N8+Ry/sjsiL JdOuFi9bGpzCqnh/4YdQ6zUxVuEi3TsfKTD+vGH6cOnB1isrnl4sqilf+XzJ82l/XL+8OPXG ZX7l99nfbwitsNX+0lRycPHqfWbW197GL105vf+MEktxRqKhFnNRcSIA/sgUbTYCAAA=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/wHrQVdkNoV4xtPwvIOO_JhLdtLM>
Cc: hipsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Comments on RFC5203bis and RFC6253bis
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 08:11:43 -0000

Hi Samu,

thanks. I have just started a WGLC on the draft.

Cheers,

Gonzalo

On 03/07/2015 8:02 AM, Samu Varjonen wrote:
> Hi Gonzalo,
> 
> In my opinion yes
> 
> BR,
> Samu
> 
> Lainaus Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com
> <mailto:Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>>:
> 
>> Hi Samu,
>>
>> to be clear, you are saying that the draft is ready for Working Group
>> Last Call, is that right?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Gonzalo
>>
>> On 01/07/2015 9:14 AM, Samu Varjonen wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> to my knowledge rfc6253-bis does not need changes to work with rfc7401.
>>> Review and comments would still be welcome.
>>>
>>> -Samu
>>>
>>> On 30/06/15 10:10, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Samu,
>>>>
>>>> thanks for having revised RFC6253bis:
>>>>
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis/
>>>>
>>>> Could you please let us know the current status of the draft now that it
>>>> has been revised? That is, what needs to happen next and what is needed
>>>> overall before the draft is ready for WGLC.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Gonzalo
>>>>
>>>> On 23/06/2015 11:15 AM, Samu Varjonen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> yes, we will update the document as soon as possible.
>>>>>
>>>>> BR,
>>>>> Samu Varjonen
>>>>>
>>>>> On 19/06/15 10:06, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Authors of RFC5203bis and RFC6253bis,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the RFC5203bis document has a Normative reference to RFC6263bis:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-08#section-3.3
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-01
>>>>>>
>>>>>> RFC 6253bis is an expired document. First we need to revise it so that
>>>>>> it re-appears in the IETF archives. Additionally, since it is a
>>>>>> normative dependency of RFC5203bis, we should include it in the
>>>>>> publication batch we are currently working on (RFC5203bis, RFC5204bis,
>>>>>> and RFC5205bis).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Authors of RFC6253, could you please provide the WG with am update on
>>>>>> your plans to revise this document?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Authors of RFC5203bis, could you please update the following outdated
>>>>>> reference?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis -> RFC 7401
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gonzalo
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Hipsec mailing list
>>>>>> Hipsec@ietf.org <mailto:Hipsec@ietf.org>
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Hipsec mailing list
>>>>> Hipsec@ietf.org <mailto:Hipsec@ietf.org>
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
>>>>>  
>>
>>