IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Hipsec] comments on draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-01

Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com> Fri, 25 February 2011 17:33 UTC

Return-Path: <rgm@htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A423A67EB for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:33:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4+xOfnGS4YK2 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:33:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from klovia.htt-consult.com (klovia.htt-consult.com [208.83.67.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B483A65A5 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:33:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by klovia.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BABB62AB7; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 17:34:27 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at localhost
Received: from klovia.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (klovia.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6zxEmj+Ah0WK; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:34:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nc2400.htt-consult.com (nc2400.htt-consult.com [208.83.67.155]) (Authenticated sender: rgm@htt-consult.com) by klovia.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DE99762A95; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:34:01 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4D67E804.60709@htt-consult.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:33:56 -0500
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Miika Komu <mkomu@cs.hut.fi>
References: <FD98F9C3CBABA74E89B5D4B5DE0263B9379A8486D1@XCH-NW-12V.nw.nos.boeing.com> <4D626A88.6060806@htt-consult.com> <4D62845E.1020603@cs.hut.fi>
In-Reply-To: <4D62845E.1020603@cs.hut.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: hip WG <hipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] comments on draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-01
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 17:33:57 -0000

On 02/21/2011 10:27 AM, Miika Komu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 21/02/11 15:37, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>> - ESP (5202), Rendezvous (5204), and DNS (5205) are listed as normative
>>>    references, but 5201 is not referenced
>>>
>>> Section 5.1 talks about moving Host Identities from one physical
>>> computer to
>>> another without breaking transport associations. Really?
>>
>> You would need a secure channel (hint, hint) to move the Security
>> Association, including all private key needed that are not technically
>> part of the SA.  But, yes, there are people looking into this for cloud
>> computing.
>
> actually I would agree with Jeff here. I think the experiment report 
> would be a better fit for such research work. I would include also 
> reference to the earlier work:
>
> http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.79.5588&rep=rep1&type=pdf 
>

Please help with the text change and the Informative reference.

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status