Re: [Hipsec] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-08: (with COMMENT)

Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm> Wed, 06 July 2016 07:10 UTC

Return-Path: <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDDDD12D68F; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 00:10:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fastmail.fm header.b=P62+Sscr; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=ZgAx1qJy
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LejNtgxOfkRc; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 00:10:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74D7E12D67E; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 00:10:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E5E20233; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 03:10:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 06 Jul 2016 03:10:04 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=MnHm9VKaRHGpfGcafnoKyuFl50s=; b=P62+Ss cr16AOwp0ghoIT8N3xqludepZv2U5IeRwmUPYIc0Rv/XG5YQYPN5QgrDzYt+1T9N t1VjzXXiv3CP3IuBlH8spq7dQjpuOWYLUa9/qEYy6crPz3bZB63qYZ3btyJx7cv6 ssnNi+nrr7JYLfGvUUluSIMazchN2ILOlNvCE=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=MnHm9VKaRHGpfGc afnoKyuFl50s=; b=ZgAx1qJyGtyQeeFqXgCrEX1qU9/misIoJHnRUkVov4I4PHm DWeAsiboQv2sqLERUoDLgDpMzk60iIIbqqtTi56J9p0tSW5ky0u1vo/Xmgk0Ikr7 YySJOGxbu1YOfgh+2cNxCFm03bqCLZzTcGNwXWI3nxK0T4bgmaCwfVDBat+A=
X-Sasl-enc: 3aYgO5/DfZUJYRXGGfCHgcTBsaFMB88cOgxVDzMVWGSf 1467789003
Received: from [10.6.96.199] (unknown [85.255.235.121]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9BF59CCDB2; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 03:10:03 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13F69)
In-Reply-To: <20160706011332.22267.32619.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 08:18:59 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <571D68AB-C327-4ABE-9B40-D6BDBC75E669@fastmail.fm>
References: <20160706011332.22267.32619.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/wwV-_1E1kjOsjD2Ke3gavo90meA>
Cc: hipsec@ietf.org, hip-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 07:10:07 -0000


> On 6 Jul 2016, at 02:13, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>; wrote:
> 
> I agree with Alexey's discuss comment that the IANA considerations from
> the obsoleted RFC need to be pulled forward to this one. In my opinion,
> if the RFC is obsoleted, one should no longer need to read it.

The last sentence is exactly what I was trying to convey.