[Hipsec] Looking for slides on Relay server

Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com> Thu, 22 May 2014 20:16 UTC

Return-Path: <rgm@htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937871A02A9 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 May 2014 13:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uswgUgxqEAcU for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 May 2014 13:16:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from klovia.htt-consult.com (klovia.htt-consult.com [IPv6:2607:f4b8:3:0:218:71ff:fe83:66b9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E64291A0313 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 May 2014 13:16:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by klovia.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1470B6348D for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 May 2014 20:16:26 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at localhost
Received: from klovia.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (klovia.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id azE6J++OJ3hO for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 May 2014 16:16:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lx120e.htt-consult.com (lx120e2.htt-consult.com [208.83.67.155]) (Authenticated sender: rgm@htt-consult.com) by klovia.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D159D62A74 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 May 2014 16:16:15 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <537E5B0F.1090004@htt-consult.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 16:16:15 -0400
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: hipsec@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/zW7mzvbNZeEs3PNpx2OgHbXCFcI
Subject: [Hipsec] Looking for slides on Relay server
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 20:16:49 -0000

At times I would like to strangle myself.  WHY did I ever create private 
addresses for IPv4 and thus create a market for NAT boxes?????  Well if 
I have not been involved, it would have still happened.  The use cases 
were out there and ROAD was dead.  Enough handwringing.  We have Nasty 
NATs and mobile devices pop in and out of them.  So we have to relay.

But only the WiFi connection would get behind bad NATs.  My testing over 
Verizon Wireless has worked well without relaying.  So one MIGHT think 
that with LOCATORs we could say that this locator need not relay, but 
this better.  Of course the phones have this tendency to roam and 
perhaps not all cellular providers are set up not to need relaying....

Andrei's lecture notes do not cover the relay server part, only rvs and 
I3 stuff.  I am looking for some slides to cover relay.

thanks