IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Hipsec] RFC5201-bis and RFC5202-bis status

Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Mon, 15 September 2014 11:37 UTC

Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71CE11A0B14 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 04:37:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iHR9U9yGhbkV for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 04:37:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sessmg22.ericsson.net (sessmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82F6D1A068E for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 04:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3a-f79da6d0000008c7-ed-5416cf8ee105
Received: from ESESSHC010.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sessmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id FC.30.02247.E8FC6145; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:37:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [131.160.36.95] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.174.1; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:37:49 +0200
Message-ID: <5416CF8D.1070707@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 14:37:49 +0300
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Henderson <tomh@tomh.org>
References: <20140905182558.7340.5516.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <540A04E3.2040203@tomh.org> <9BFCB5CC-FD77-49C2-9A67-39AEB45530D1@nominum.com> <540B2A2E.9040905@tomh.org> <540C3EB0.2000004@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <540C3EB0.2000004@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrLLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvjW7febEQgz/9ahaHFl9itZjZ84/R 4tDLP8wWUxdNZraYvvcau8XW7liLC+t/sVg03v3D5MDh0bKql9ljbfdVNo9Vr9rZPHbOusvu sWTJTyaPmce/sHi8PjCf1WPPNY0Ajigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujKNL1rAVLOSreLvrIVsD4yHu LkZODgkBE4lZm1exQ9hiEhfurWfrYuTiEBI4yijxYecpdghnNaNEz4pvbCBVvALaEjP+vgCz WQRUJeY/Xc4IYrMJWEhsuXWfBcQWFYiSeLXiBitEvaDEyZlPwOIiAooSlw71sYIMZRbYwiTx eM5DsEHCQM3b911ihNh2nFHiy8uvYFM5BTQlmmf1MXUxcgDdJy7R0xgEEmYW0JOYcrWFEcKW l9j+dg4ziC0EdNzyZy0sExiFZiHZPQtJyywkLQsYmVcxihanFhfnphsZ6aUWZSYXF+fn6eWl lmxiBMbPwS2/rXYwHnzueIhRgINRiYd3wQ6xECHWxLLiytxDjNIcLErivAvPzQsWEkhPLEnN Tk0tSC2KLyrNSS0+xMjEwSnVwJj8+1/BzPWa/ZYbeqZF9rw6l7rqe8+BXklmRwu3Q1f+GrHf UWcUvdq3Je6lZpvzTLelV2Rj3NUcl39k+F/j9NV+0sFaJ8/DtnH5po+vBMSuKxLx4v41K1nF WW/izK+a1qtU2D17rpldv9S2df2iy5cyhW452HBbix+7t0PphZ3R06Nrq6bsTVViKc5INNRi LipOBAAzoxLpgAIAAA==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/zzNpFBdmhxJzMhJl9j4J-E_zX_M
Cc: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@ericsson.com>, HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>, Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr, Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] RFC5201-bis and RFC5202-bis status
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 11:37:54 -0000

Hi Tom (Henderson),

Jari, Brian, and Ted still have discusses on this document. Could you
please summarize for each of them the status of this draft with respect
to their particular comments?

Thanks,

Gonzalo


On 07/09/2014 2:17 PM, Tom Taylor wrote:
> I'm happy with the outcome. The list discussion addressed the issue. I
> believe the outcome is: "The plaintext attack is resistible, not a real
> problem, and need not be addressed in the document."
> 
> Tom Taylor
> 
> On 06/09/2014 11:37 AM, Tom Henderson wrote:
>> On 09/06/2014 08:25 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
>>> It looks like the latest rev of 5201-bis does not address the gen-art
>>> review comments nor Francis Dupont's comments, and I haven't seen any
>>> follow-up discussion on Francis' comments.   What do the authors
>>> believe the status of these two comment threads is?
>>>
>>
>> Ted,
>>
>> I believe that there is only one open issue left from the Gen-Art
>> review, regarding possible plaintext attacks:
>>
>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/hip/trac/ticket/42
>>
>> The list discussion on this issue leans against making any change; see
>> the last message of this thread:
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/current/msg03903.html
>>
>> I think I previously handled all of the other comments; if I missed any,
>> please point them out.
>>
>> I have tried to contact Francis a couple of times regarding
>> clarification of his comments and have not seen a reply.  This is
>> tracked in issue:
>>
>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/hip/trac/ticket/49
>>
>> I'm cc'ing both Tom Taylor and Francis for any further clarifications.
>>
>> - Tom
>>
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Hipsec mailing list
> Hipsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email