IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [HOKEY] REMINDER: WGLC on draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-04

Zhen Cao <zehn.cao@gmail.com> Mon, 15 August 2011 09:03 UTC

Return-Path: <zehn.cao@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F3621F8AB0 for <hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 02:03:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.306
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.306 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.293, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VCLUKqyv5Hld for <hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 02:03:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FCC821F8A23 for <hokey@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 02:03:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iye1 with SMTP id 1so6918672iye.27 for <hokey@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 02:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tGg0uPpsL408p7JGbmjSTgWVXKstqQteyhLlBJ5UIHA=; b=gXFbaZE75+4cPwJAbVj4Fv2A4HGuqNjazU7pUPztmzczSTadPh7kdRSQH4CFbpSSX4 4k4yrGNu+HJBmqGR5wqmLA/sWKIsbJwDUPcMZXxY8l4V9/4si5C8+NM3UdNimUIbrFWm PiGJ6S9U8Lz8xtQlCQkMKPtqknHQikk07tVUM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.43.51.6 with SMTP id vg6mr1298016icb.466.1313399077464; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 02:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.43.47.198 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 02:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201108121010499786531@gmail.com>
References: <201108121010499786531@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 17:04:37 +0800
Message-ID: <CAProHASyk=Aq3OhG1cPzszWevCQQz-Hq_2-k6voKh_NCfz+RWw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Zhen Cao <zehn.cao@gmail.com>
To: zhangtan2011 <zhangtan2011@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: hokey <hokey@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [HOKEY] REMINDER: WGLC on draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-04
X-BeenThere: hokey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: HOKEY WG Mailing List <hokey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hokey>
List-Post: <mailto:hokey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 09:03:54 -0000

Hi Tan,

Thanks for the review.

In the current draft, the CAP is chosen by the authentication peer,
and the CAP information is included in the ERP message.

Any more comments?

Regards,
Zhen

On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:11 AM, zhangtan2011 <zhangtan2011@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Authors,
>
> I have read the document and have one question to the CAP discovery, i.e., how the CAP is chosen and what’s the criteria?
>
> Other parts sound good.
>
> Regards,
> Tan zhang
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOKEY mailing list
> HOKEY@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey
>
>



-- 
Best regards,
Zhen

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email