Re: [HOKEY] I-D Action:draft-ietf-hokey-rfc5296bis-02.txt
Qin Wu <sunseawq@huawei.com> Mon, 14 March 2011 06:58 UTC
Return-Path: <sunseawq@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: hokey@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hokey@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 6EAC43A67FF; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 23:58:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.724
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.724 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.771,
BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cpgv9fsdBSAV;
Sun, 13 Mar 2011 23:58:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (unknown [119.145.14.66]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EDBA3A6A60;
Sun, 13 Mar 2011 23:58:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga03-in [172.24.2.9]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id
<0LI100AQ7COZ72@szxga03-in.huawei.com>; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:58:11 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet
Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id
<0LI100MI6COZNZ@szxga03-in.huawei.com>; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:58:11 +0800 (CST)
Received: from w53375 ([10.138.41.70]) by szxml06-in.huawei.com (iPlanet
Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id
<0LI100LLGCOZVS@szxml06-in.huawei.com>; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:58:11 +0800 (CST)
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:58:11 +0800
From: Qin Wu <sunseawq@huawei.com>
To: hokey@ietf.org
Message-id: <033901cbe215$2ecf4fc0$46298a0a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3664
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3664
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <20110314063002.28048.8408.idtracker@localhost>
Cc: ipsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [HOKEY] I-D Action:draft-ietf-hokey-rfc5296bis-02.txt
X-BeenThere: hokey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: HOKEY WG Mailing List <hokey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey>,
<mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hokey>
List-Post: <mailto:hokey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey>,
<mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 06:58:06 -0000
Hi, folks: We submit the new version of draft-ietf-hokey-rfc5296bis to reflect our discussion on the list after the last meeting which is available at: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-hokey-rfc5296bis-02.txt Here is the diff: http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-hokey-rfc5296bis-01&difftype=--html&submit=Go%21&url2=draft-ietf-hokey-rfc5296bis-02 The major changes compared to the previous version 00 are: o Change using MAY in section 5.3.1.1 to using SHOULD o Mandate sending the EAP-Initiate/Re-auth-Start message instead of optional o Update obsolete reference RFC4306 into RFC5996 o Allow local server respond to the peer directly without forwarding the ERP message to the home domain Thanks for Sebastien and Andy valuable comments. Some of them have been taken in the updating. As for the remaining issues in Sebastien's proposals for simplying bootstapping and remove local and home distinction, I think the problem does exist. The proposals are some kind of ERP optimization, but I am suspecting whether they are the only ways. Let's discuss and solicit the consesus in the upcoming Prague meeting. Also your comments are welcome before the meeting! Regards! -Qin ----- Original Message ----- From: <Internet-Drafts@ietf.org> To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org> Cc: <hokey@ietf.org> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 2:30 PM Subject: [HOKEY] I-D Action:draft-ietf-hokey-rfc5296bis-02.txt >A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the Handover Keying Working Group of the IETF. > > > Title : EAP Extensions for EAP Re-authentication Protocol (ERP) > Author(s) : W. Wu, et al. > Filename : draft-ietf-hokey-rfc5296bis-02.txt > Pages : 44 > Date : 2011-03-13 > > The Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) is a generic framework > supporting multiple types of authentication methods. In systems > where EAP is used for authentication, it is desirable to not repeat > the entire EAP exchange with another authenticator. This document > specifies extensions to EAP and the EAP keying hierarchy to support > an EAP method-independent protocol for efficient re-authentication > between the peer and an EAP re-authentication server through any > authenticator. The re-authentication server may be in the home > network or in the local network to which the peer is connecting. > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-hokey-rfc5296bis-02.txt > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader > implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the > Internet-Draft. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > HOKEY mailing list > HOKEY@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey >